Teams

WP PURPLE

2025 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER - DEN · MIXED 8.0 - 18 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-18vs CACM REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesAdam Gunther / Sasha Parker vs Jill Barghelame / Robert Saddler6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLisa Christman / Manish Sharma vs Lissa Moon / Peter Nicolson3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMolly Burke / Casper Lundemann vs ARTHUR VAUGHN / NATALIE KOONTZ6-4, 7-5
2025-05-17vs SKY REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesPeter Satagaj / Miki Aylesworth vs Jennifer Urbonas / Gregory Tamkin5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAnasa Shank / Jesse Park vs Jennifer Lester / James Mejia3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesLisa Christman / Adam Gunther vs Coupar Lester / Cory Dunnick6-3, 6-4
2025-05-04vs GAC BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesSasha Parker / Peter Satagaj vs Monica Hustead / Martin Rankin6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLisa Christman / Casper Lundemann vs Stacy Dent / Mike Lammens3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMiki Aylesworth / Alan Caffey vs Cynthia Wessinger / Thomas Forti6-2, 6-1
2025-04-27vs DTP REDLost 12
W#1 DoublesSasha Parker / Nicholas Moore vs Bonnie Bauer / Connor MacCullen6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesMolly Burke / Casper Lundemann vs Gwen Olsen / Tane Olsen4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesAnasa Shank / Jesse Park vs Gabrielle Mattioda / Namuun Abbi4-6, 1-6
2025-04-13vs CACM GOLDWon 21
W#1 DoublesSasha Parker / Nicholas Moore vs Craig Stromberg / Diana Rael6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesLisa Christman / Manish Sharma vs Adam Huff / Jessica Pohl5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMolly Burke / Casper Lundemann vs Craig Claxton / Carmencita Lewis6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2025-04-06vs EM YELLOWLost 12
L#1 DoublesSasha Parker / Nicholas Moore vs Becca Mahoney / Joe Mahoney6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLisa Christman / Adam Gunther vs Olaf Siverson / Karen Guzzetta6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesPeter Satagaj / Miki Aylesworth vs Colley Moe / Daniel Moe4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings17 teams · MIXED 8.0 - 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WP PURPLE6116515164
2DTC GOLD6115615174
3BTA-F GREEN5215613159
4CCV ORANGE5215616143
5BP SILVER5212920159
6RRTC RED5212924190
7MC BLUE34111021169
8SS-LT PURPLE34101127197
9SS-HP GREEN3491227211
10KC-CC ORANGE3481328196
11KNO BLUE3491228206
12NJ BLACK3481329213
13NJ BRONZE2451326188
14WP TEAL25101126202
15WP-C BLUE2571430226
16PRC YELLOW1671433222
17LTA-P BLUE1641736230

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Sasha Parker
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 4.5
4.02
Manish Sharma
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.82
Lisa Christman
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.70
Peter Satagaj
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.68
Adam Gunther
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.59
Miki Aylesworth
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.58
Anasa Shank
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.55
Casper Lundemann
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.53
Alan Caffey
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.44
Molly Burke
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.41
Nicholas Moore
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jesse Park
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Casper Lundemann + Molly Burke6552% games+11.3% vs expected
Sasha Parker + Adam Gunther6158% games+3.7% vs expected
Anasa Shank + Manish Sharma2346% gamesnot enough data
Adam Gunther + Lisa Christman3249% gamesnot enough data
Casper Lundemann + Lisa Christman314 matchesnot enough data
Sasha Parker + Nicholas Moore213 matchesnot enough data
Molly Burke + Peter Satagaj123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Sasha Parker
60W–20L career · 9 lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
4.13
Manish Sharma
22W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
4.02
Lisa Christman
43W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Peter Satagaj
33W–29L career · 6 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Adam Gunther
45W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Miki Aylesworth
84W–112L career · 7 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.59
4
Anasa Shank
100W–51L career · type A · 5 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.58
3.5
Casper Lundemann
81W–42L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.55
4
Alan Caffey
15W–26L career · 3 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.53
Molly Burke
59W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.44
Nicholas Moore
27W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
3.41
Jesse Park
5W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.