Teams

BTA-C YELLOW

2026 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 8.0 - 55 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-06-12vs NJ BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesHilary Hartwig / Kim Kadlic vs Anne Steputis / Jennifer Stiebeling6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesYoshiko Yamashita / Elizabeth Korniczky vs Barbara Everard / Jeanette Palizzi6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesRachel Bloombaum / Jeanne Peoples vs Susie Spiegler / Marcella Lucas6-4, 7-6
2026-06-05vs BRMST GREENWon 30
W#1 DoublesHilary Hartwig / Elizabeth Korniczky vs Yayoi Shaw / Mary Jensen6-2
W#2 DoublesRachel Bloombaum / Jean Crawford vs Stacey Mari / Kathy Schmidt6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDewi Win / Priscilla Dana vs Pamela Sewell / Kim Graves7-5, 7-5
2026-05-29vs NJ ORANGELost 12
W#1 DoublesHilary Hartwig / Yoshiko Yamashita vs Charlene Bailey / Diana Guettlein7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKim Kadlic / Lydia Wuensch vs Darcie Coy / Sheri Wright0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJean Crawford / Melissa Bonnette vs Orit Ostrowiak / Sandra Lucero Jacquez6-7, 1-6
2026-05-22vs MEA ORANGELost 03
L#1 DoublesHilary Hartwig / Kim Kadlic vs Jenny Knight / Amy Novak6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJean Crawford / Yoshiko Yamashita vs Lucy Kuchta / Kathleen Lupo3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Korniczky / Paula Nelsen vs Tanya Goble / Sharon Day6-0, 4-6, 0-1
2026-05-15vs BTA-IBM TEALWon 21
W#1 DoublesMelissa Bonnette / Elizabeth Korniczky vs Jennifer Ufland / Windy Cook6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPaula Nelsen / Jeanne Peoples vs Linda Vigil / Carmel Gill6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDewi Win / Priscilla Dana vs Natalie Gilbert / Ardith Falkner6-1, 6-7, 0-1
2026-05-08vs NJ BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesHilary Hartwig / Jean Crawford vs Yukiko Brooks / Deanna Espejo6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesMelissa Bonnette / Yoshiko Yamashita vs Kirstin Kraig / Susie Spiegler6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Korniczky / Lydia Wuensch vs Colleen McClary / Barbara Everard7-5, 6-2
2026-05-01vs BRMST GREENWon 30
W#1 DoublesKim Kadlic / Paula Nelsen vs Yayoi Shaw / Mary Jensen7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDewi Win / Jeanne Peoples vs Laura Tedesco / Claudia Booton6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesRachel Bloombaum / Priscilla Dana vs Michele Gosselin / Kathy Schmidt6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 8.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Hilary Hartwig
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.81
Dewi Win
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.79
Jean Crawford
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.74
Elizabeth Korniczky
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.74
Kim Kadlic
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.68
Paula Nelsen
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.64
Jeanne Peoples
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.63
Lydia Wuensch
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.60
Melissa Bonnette
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Priscilla Dana
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Rachel Bloombaum
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Yoshiko Yamashita
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paula Nelsen + Elizabeth Korniczky15758% games+1.3% vs expected
Paula Nelsen + Lydia Wuensch4448% games−2.2% vs expected
Lydia Wuensch + Kim Kadlic2343% games−11.7% vs expected
Jean Crawford + Melissa Bonnette3353% gamesnot enough data
Jean Crawford + Hilary Hartwig4159% gamesnot enough data
Melissa Bonnette + Jeanne Peoples3245% gamesnot enough data
Jean Crawford + Elizabeth Korniczky314 matchesnot enough data
Hilary Hartwig + Elizabeth Korniczky314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Hilary Hartwig
91W–56L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
4.01
4
Dewi Win
14W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.81
4
Jean Crawford
82W–41L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Elizabeth Korniczky
59W–46L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.74
Kim Kadlic
45W–33L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Paula Nelsen
85W–49L career · 5 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Jeanne Peoples
111W–109L career · 3 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.64
4
Lydia Wuensch
65W–52L career · 2 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.63
4
Melissa Bonnette
40W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.60
Priscilla Dana
12W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rachel Bloombaum
7W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Yoshiko Yamashita
5W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.