Teams

J.Taylor

2023 Cap Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.42 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-05-12vs A.Sheehan 40Split 11
W#1 DoublesHolly Camak / Jolyne Taylor vs Nancy Baird / Kris Wordsworth6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesCornelia Shaw / Teressa Paschaloudis vs Rebecca Bennett / Laura Clark1-6, 4-6
2023-05-11vs P.CochranSplit 11
W#1 DoublesHolly Camak / Jolyne Taylor vs Carol Vervaert / Jennifer Mitchell6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesCornelia Shaw / Luann Richardson vs Toni Paladino / Kellie Snider3-6, 4-6
2023-05-04vs Y.Barrow/MOsman 40Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLuann Richardson / Teressa Paschaloudis vs Elizabeth Matthews / Libby Stubbs5-7, 3-6
2023-04-20vs D.DriscollSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTeressa Paschaloudis / Kristi Wilson vs Diane Allen / Angela Pleasants3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesKimberly Durland vs Mariana Lima Gonzalez2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-04-13vs T.LeFevre/JPhillipsLost 12
L#1 DoublesTeressa Paschaloudis / Luann Richardson vs Deb Lanier / Takako Schenberger5-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesHolly Camak / Jolyne Taylor vs Lorrie Hareza / Laurie Reiss1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKimberly Durland / Gina Flynn vs Emalie Levine / Christine Subasic2-6, 0-6
2023-03-30Won 20
W#1 DoublesLuann Richardson / Teressa Paschaloudis vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesGina Flynn / Kimberly Durland vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-03-23vs R.MillsLost 02
L#1 DoublesCornelia Shaw / Luann Richardson vs Samantha Starr / Carla Williams1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJolyne Taylor / Gina Flynn vs Rachel Mills / Tara Roach3-6, 1-6
2023-03-16vs E.SCHWARTZSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTeressa Paschaloudis / Holly Camak vs Elizabeth Schwartz / Sandra Park1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesKimberly Durland vs Paige Jennings0-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-03-09vs L.Clark 40 3.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesLuann Richardson / Shelly Rogers vs Sharon Fred / Heather Roberts3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMary Liles / Cornelia Shaw vs Lynelle Clark / CARLA FIELDS2-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Jolyne Taylor
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.35
Luann Richardson
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.28
Holly Camak
published 3.5
3.27
Kimberly Durland
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.11
Teressa Paschaloudis
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
2.83
Shelly Rogers
published
2.79
Cornelia Shaw
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.74
Monica Udell
published
Kristi Wilson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Teressa Paschaloudis + Cornelia Shaw51441% games+3.1% vs expected
Holly Camak + Jolyne Taylor14459% games+2.2% vs expected
Luann Richardson + Teressa Paschaloudis253547% games+0.9% vs expected
Luann Richardson + Cornelia Shaw134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jolyne Taylor
140W–112L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%47%53%
3.51
3.5
Luann Richardson
83W–111L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Holly Camak
17W–6L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Kimberly Durland
208W–190L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Teressa Paschaloudis
56W–96L career · 6 lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.11
Shelly Rogers
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
91%9%<1%
2.83
3
Cornelia Shaw
34W–83L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%93%5%
2.79
Monica Udell
12W–19L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
2.74
Kristi Wilson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.