Teams

Match Points

2022 USTA League Adult 18 & Over - Fall 2021- HSV · 3.5 WOMEN 18N2S3D

13 players · average NTRP 3.67 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 WOMEN 18N2S3D have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Nermein Lotfy
published
3.73
Maribeth Newman
published
3.61
Debra Weaver
published 4
3.46
Jody Toms
published
3.40
Michele Tate
published
3.40
Ayesha Patel
published 3.5
3.35
Madison Swegles
published
3.32
Elizabeth Weiland
published 3.5
3.23
Melissa Jose
published
3.17
Judy Wiles
published
3.05
Janice Llewellyn
published
2.87
Linda Brewster
published
Kaitlin Chando
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janice Llewellyn + Ayesha Patel4157% games−2.0% vs expected
Michele Tate + Madison Swegles3546% games−2.5% vs expected
Elizabeth Weiland + Melissa Jose3256% games−4.2% vs expected
Judy Wiles + Linda Brewster61741% games−6.0% vs expected
Janice Llewellyn + Madison Swegles4251% games−6.8% vs expected
Janice Llewellyn + Debra Weaver123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nermein Lotfy
44W–68L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.82
Maribeth Newman
56W–43L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Debra Weaver
95W–75L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.61
Jody Toms
23W–44L career · no lines in 2022
64%36%<1%
3.46
Michele Tate
18W–50L career · no lines in 2022
77%23%<1%
3.40
3.5
Ayesha Patel
29W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.40
Madison Swegles
33W–30L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
3.35
3.5
Elizabeth Weiland
55W–35L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
Melissa Jose
115W–100L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Judy Wiles
61W–81L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
Janice Llewellyn
23W–18L career · no lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
3.05
Linda Brewster
43W–76L career · no lines in 2022
84%16%<1%
2.87
Kaitlin Chando
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.