Teams

3.5 DCRV HollandPerrin W18Fday

2022 FALL Adult 18 & over DAYTIME · Adult 18 & Over Day 3.5 Mon

12 players · average NTRP 3.42 / CENTRAL ARIZONA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule14 played
2021-12-06vs 3.5 KIW MillerVansk W18FdaySplit 11
L#1 DoublesGuillermina Gutmann / Heidi Holland vs Michele Miller / Melissa Hess6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSara Estervig / Natalie Schmidtke vs Cheryl Humphreys / Jennifer Stevens7-6, 6-7, 1-0
2021-11-29vs 3.5 OCV Berry W18FdayLost 03
L#1 DoublesSara Estervig / Maryclaire Collis vs Yvette Baxter / Bonnie Greco1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDeb Jensen / Catherine Glandon vs Jelenann Day / Stacie Muller4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSuzanne James / Ari Smith vs Michele Berry / Stephanie Bryant1-6, 2-6
2021-11-22vs 3.5 SRP Milton W18FdayWon 30
W#1 DoublesMitzi Kim / Christi Richards vs Sabrina Havard / Leslie Hamburger6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMaryclaire Collis / Guillermina Gutmann vs Jillian English / Diane Triester4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMichelle Elliott / Catherine Glandon vs SuLan Peebles / Nancy Downey3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2021-11-15vs 3.5 PTC Jaquess W18FdayWon 20
W#1 DoublesMitzi Kim / Christi Richards vs Sherry Paris / Melissa Powell6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSara Estervig / Guillermina Gutmann vs Donna Pace / Jodie Wong2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-11-08vs 3.5 SRP Grady W18FdayWon 21
W#1 DoublesMitzi Kim / Natalie Schmidtke vs Denise Chrystowski / Angie Eggstaff6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMaryclaire Collis / Guillermina Gutmann vs Jeanne Donahue / Janice Sguardo6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSuzanne James / Michelle Elliott vs Sarah Byrne / Nancy Carey0-6, 3-6
2021-11-01vs FALL WIN 3.5 Schreiber W18FdayLost 12
W#1 DoublesSara Estervig / Guillermina Gutmann vs Michala Hauber / Susan Lewis6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMaryclaire Collis / Michelle Elliott vs Audrey Feliz / Babette Montgomery1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDeb Jensen / Brenda Shaffer vs Lisa Schreiber / Jeanette Jones3-6, 0-6
2021-10-25vs 3.5 DCRV Heron W18FdayLost 12
W#1 DoublesMitzi Kim / Christi Richards vs Rae Miller-Denton / Jody Bafus6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHeidi Holland / Guillermina Gutmann vs Allison Roy / Jane Kennedy2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesSuzanne James / Michelle Elliott vs Cari Brodsky Hemmert / Susan Frank7-6, 5-7, 0-1
2021-10-18vs 3.5 OCV Berry W18FdayLost 12
L#1 DoublesGuillermina Gutmann / Natalie Schmidtke vs Jelenann Day / Stacie Muller6-0, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesGloria Chaney / Heidi Holland vs Michele Berry / Stephanie Bryant2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSuzanne James / Ari Smith vs Diane James / Rhonda Taylor7-5, 6-3
2021-10-18vs 3.5 KIW MillerVansk W18FdaySplit 11
L#1 DoublesMitzi Kim / Christi Richards vs Lanna Greifzu / Michele Miller2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDeb Jensen / Brenda Shaffer vs Karen Haymond / Cheryl Humphreys5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2021-10-04vs 3.5 SRP Milton W18FdayLost 03
L#1 DoublesCatherine Glandon / Natalie Schmidtke vs Ingrid Reimers / Virginia Obrien4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesBrenda Shaffer / Suzanne James vs Jillian English / Sabrina Havard1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesDeb Jensen / Ari Smith vs Pam Meyer / Leslie Hamburger3-6, 1-6
2021-09-27vs 3.5 PTC Jaquess W18FdaySplit 11
W#1 DoublesMitzi Kim / Natalie Schmidtke vs Melissa Powell / Sherry Paris6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesGuillermina Gutmann / Deb Jensen vs Terri Sakata / Jodie Wong4-6, 6-7
2021-09-20vs 3.5 SRP Grady W18FdayWon 30
W#1 DoublesSara Estervig / Natalie Schmidtke vs Mary Carmody / Christine Wilson7-6, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCatherine Glandon / Heidi Holland vs Stephanie McLachlan / Kathleen Snyder6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBrenda Shaffer / Suzanne James vs Jeanne Donahue / Janice Sguardo2-6, 6-0, 1-0
2021-09-13vs FALL WIN 3.5 Schreiber W18FdaySplit 11
L#1 DoublesHeidi Holland / Catherine Glandon vs Jeanette Jones / Babette Montgomery2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSara Estervig / Natalie Schmidtke vs Kara Ericksen / Angie Brown7-6, 6-4
2021-08-30vs 3.5 DCRV Heron W18FdayWon 21
L#1 DoublesHeidi Holland / Mitzi Kim vs Holly Cardinali / Allison Roy4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesGuillermina Gutmann / Natalie Schmidtke vs Carrie Boyer / Ashley McClenaghan7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSara Estervig / Brenda Shaffer vs Jody Bafus / Sherry Goodman3-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · Adult 18 & Over Day 3.5 Mon
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1FALL WIN 3.5 Schreiber W18Fday13134824267
23.5 OCV Berry W18Fday86251738344
33.5 KIW MillerVansk W18Fday86222047385
43.5 DCRV Heron W18Fday86212148375
53.5 PTC Jaquess W18Fday77192350389
63.5 SRP Milton W18Fday68202253420
73.5 DCRV HollandPerrin W18Fday59202255433
83.5 SRP Grady W18Fday11373574473

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Heidi Holland
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.32
Deana Perrin
published 3.5
Catherine Glandon
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.24
Guillermina Gutmann
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Deb Jensen
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.64
Brenda Shaffer
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Christi Richards
published
Maryclaire Collis
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Mitzi Kim
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Natalie Schmidtke
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Sara Estervig
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Suzanne James
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Guillermina Gutmann + Natalie Schmidtke7172% games+15.0% vs expected
Sara Estervig + Natalie Schmidtke7063% games+5.9% vs expected
Deana Perrin + Heidi Holland1541% games+2.1% vs expected
Maryclaire Collis + Guillermina Gutmann5350% games−1.5% vs expected
Sara Estervig + Guillermina Gutmann10554% games−1.6% vs expected
Heidi Holland + Guillermina Gutmann71643% games−3.7% vs expected
Deb Jensen + Guillermina Gutmann3547% gamesnot enough data
Suzanne James + Deana Perrin1547% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Heidi Holland
102W–166L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Deana Perrin
118W–206L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Catherine Glandon
13W–16L career · type S · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Guillermina Gutmann
81W–84L career · 9 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Deb Jensen
47W–61L career · 5 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.15
3
Brenda Shaffer
20W–45L career · 5 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
2.64
Christi Richards
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Maryclaire Collis
38W–42L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mitzi Kim
48W–29L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Natalie Schmidtke
52W–22L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sara Estervig
27W–18L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Suzanne James
117W–155L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.