Teams

Ka.Serow55C5.5

2026 Capital Combo 55 & Over · 5.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 2.90 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-17vs Ly.Longest55CWon 20
W#2 DoublesAnn Walters / Kimberly Roberts vs Christine Mccorquodale / Susan Lavrack7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCarol Rosser / Randi Rosen vs Kendra Gladwin / Pam Tousseau6-2, 6-2
2026-08-10vs Mi.Lee55CWon 21
W#1 DoublesKaren Blume / Randi Rosen vs Alisa Miller / Heidi Doyle6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKathleen Serow / Darsan Russo vs Lori Larrabee / Veda Bynum3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAnn Walters / Jane Bossert vs Lorna Hirsch / Terry Marcott6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 5.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ka.Serow55C5.52051229
2El.Zimmerman55C1142540
3Ki.Lamb55C5.51133760
4Be.Pegram55C1124968
5Mi.Lee55C0112534
6Ly.Longest55C0103637

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.47 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.87
Karen Blume
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.83
Kathleen Serow
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Ann Walters
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.64
Gwen Coyte
published
2.60
Carol Rosser
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.51
Kimberly Roberts
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.43
Martha Lempicke
published
2.35
Randi Rosen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.30
Jane Bossert
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.13
Darsan Russo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.04
Jill Rhim
published
Maria Riemann
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Blume + Carol Rosser314 matchesnot enough data
Carol Rosser + Kathleen Serow213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Karen Blume
42W–37L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%82%18%
2.87
3
Kathleen Serow
132W–119L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
2.83
3
Ann Walters
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Gwen Coyte
1W–4L career · no lines in 2026
16%84%1%
2.64
3
Carol Rosser
45W–76L career · 4 lines in 2026
24%75%<1%
2.60
Kimberly Roberts
4W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
0%48%52%
2.51
Martha Lempicke
0W–4L career · no lines in 2026
69%31%<1%
2.43
Randi Rosen
11W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%86%14%
2.35
Jane Bossert
10W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
0%92%8%
2.30
2.5
Darsan Russo
67W–102L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Jill Rhim
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.04
Maria Riemann
2W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.