Teams

TING.Robison

2025 CTRL Summer Singles 40 & Over · Summer Singles 40 & Over 2.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 2.60 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-09-02vs ACP.ChambersWon 30
W#1 SinglesDeicy Love vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesDianna White vs Ann Mullins6-0, 6-4
W#3 SinglesPaula Laine vs Michelle Fleer6-2, 6-3
2025-08-13vs ACP.ChambersLost 01
L#2 SinglesPaula Laine vs Ann Mullins3-6, 1-6
2025-07-30vs ACP.ChambersLost 02
L#1 SinglesKatie Lilly vs Paola Karina Ubilla Jofre0-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesPaula Laine vs Ruth Smith6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2025-07-23vs ACP.ChambersWon 20
W#1 SinglesDianna White vs Ann Mullins6-4, 6-1
W#2 SinglesDeicy Love vs Lauren Doyle6-0, 6-2
2025-07-21vs ACP.ChambersSplit 11
L#2 SinglesKatie Lilly vs Paola Karina Ubilla Jofre2-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesDeicy Love vs Judith Hagopian-Edwards6-1, 6-0
2025-07-08vs ACP.ChambersWon 20
W#2 SinglesDianna White vs Lauren Doyle6-0, 6-3
W#3 SinglesDeicy Love vs Kendall Ogren6-0, 6-0
2025-07-07vs ACP.ChambersSplit 11
L#1 SinglesPaula Laine vs Paola Karina Ubilla Jofre3-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesDeicy Love vs Ruth Smith6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Summer Singles 40 & Over 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.58 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.11
Dianna White
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.68
Deicy Love
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #3 Singles 40% · published 2.5
2.64
Cara Casuccio
published 2.5
2.47
Laura Robison
published
2.33
Paula Laine
usually #3 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 2.5
2.26
Katie Lilly
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paula Laine + Katie Lilly5645% games+0.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Dianna White
180W–85L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.11
2.5
Deicy Love
55W–26L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%9%91%
2.68
2.5
Cara Casuccio
23W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%15%85%
2.64
Laura Robison
12W–6L career · no lines in 2025
0%58%42%
2.47
2.5
Paula Laine
64W–114L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%91%9%
2.33
2.5
Katie Lilly
40W–52L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.26

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.