Teams

3.0 Men

2026 Foothills Spring 18 & Over League · Refunds

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Flight standings2 teams · Refunds
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
14.0 Women000000
23.0 Men000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.14
Duncan McMillan
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.06
Jason Harris
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
2.99
Tim Wood
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.86
Bradley Connor
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.85
Jason Howard
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
2.82
Matt Everley
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.70
Eric Geyer
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Terry Collins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Duncan McMillan + Bradley Connor7352% games+7.0% vs expected
Matt Everley + Jason Howard224 matchesnot enough data
Duncan McMillan + Jason Harris213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Duncan McMillan
12W–9L career · 8 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.14
Jason Harris
20W–11L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
3.06
Tim Wood
7W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
2.99
3
Bradley Connor
12W–11L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
2.86
Jason Howard
9W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%86%14%
2.85
Matt Everley
11W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
Eric Geyer
3W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.70
Terry Collins
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.