Teams

Empire Tennis

2024 18&Over Men · 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.17 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-07-02vs ROC: Wolf PackWon 10
W#1 DoublesSambit Mohapatra / Alan Grossfield vs Russell VanTyle / Amit Revankar3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-06-25vs ROC: Wolf PackWon 10
W#1 DoublesAlan Grossfield / Sambit Mohapatra vs David Gibbons / Ryan Mott7-5, 5-7, 1-0
2024-06-11vs ROC: Wolf PackLost 01
L#2 DoublesDaniel Maffia / Alan Grossfield vs Josh Gingrich / Chad Heatwole2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-06-04vs ROC: Wolf PackLost 01
L#1 DoublesAlan Grossfield / Mitchell Vargas vs Peter Owh / Ray Kim5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ROC: Full Metal Racquets60291393
2Empire Tennis0612958349

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Alan Grossfield
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.15
Tim Lyon
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Aurelian Niculescu
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.75
Daniel Maffia
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
John-Charles Dimperio
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Mark Balsamo
published
Peter Stein
published
Robert Salmon
published
Sambit Mohapatra
published
Yi Xu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aurelian Niculescu + Daniel Maffia033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Alan Grossfield
30W–28L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%5%95%
3.71
Tim Lyon
9W–41L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%13%87%
3.15
3
Aurelian Niculescu
5W–22L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Daniel Maffia
4W–16L career · 5 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
2.75
John-Charles Dimperio
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Mark Balsamo
13W–17L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Peter Stein
0W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Robert Salmon
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sambit Mohapatra
13W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Yi Xu
3W–11L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.