Teams

Grindstaff/Sheth

2025 Combo 18 & Over- Knoxville · 5.5 Women Combo Doubles

14 players · average NTRP 2.62 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-04vs GomesLost 02
L#1 DoublesAshley Tipton / Mary Reid Martens vs Jenna Gomes / Kristen Overbay1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesHilary Brooks / Katharine Brosnan vs Ann Wegner / Imke Burfeind4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-09-20vs OConnorWon 21
W#1 DoublesParker Casler / Katharine Brosnan vs Amy Alspaugh / Linn Guerrero6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Mendoza / Mary Reid Martens vs Anna Kizer / Christa Cole4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCheri Arnsdorff / Kristen Jones vs Meredith Holtz / Lindsey Gallaher2-6, 1-6
2025-09-17vs GomesLost 12
L#1 DoublesHilary Brooks / Chelsea Grindstaff vs Jen Stallings / Ann Wegner3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesEmily Miner / Savannah Johnson vs Carolina Lyngh / Megan Tabor1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesKatharine Brosnan / Sarah Olesiuk vs Lauren Ladd / Ashley Hoskins6-3, 6-4
2025-08-28vs OConnorLost 03
L#1 DoublesKristen Jones / Jennifer Mendoza vs Kayla O'Connor / Alex Quinn6-0, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKetki Sheth / Sarah Olesiuk vs Meredith Holtz / Emilyn Bellingrath6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCheri Arnsdorff / Catherine White vs Lindsey Gallaher / Christa Cole1-6, 2-6
2025-08-17vs GomesLost 02
L#2 DoublesJennifer Mendoza / Mary Reid Martens vs Sarah Scott / Ashley Hoskins2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesHilary Brooks / Chelsea Grindstaff vs Jamie Nuyen / Brook Park4-6, 2-6
2025-08-09vs OConnorLost 03
L#1 DoublesEmily Miner / Ashley Tipton vs Sarah Henderson / Katerina Apking1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKetki Sheth / Katie Warden vs Amy Alspaugh / Meredith Holtz2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSavannah Johnson / Sarah Olesiuk vs Carly OConnor / Alex Quinn3-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women Combo Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.48 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.88
Sarah Olesiuk
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.74
Mary Reid Martens
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.62
Emily Miner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.60
Hilary Brooks
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.54
Parker Casler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.51
Jennifer Mendoza
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
2.48
Katharine Brosnan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.45
Audrey Stokely
published 2.5
2.43
Ashley Tipton
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 2.5
2.39
Cheri Arnsdorff
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 2.5
2.29
Ketki Sheth
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.28
Chelsea Grindstaff
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.08
Savannah Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Katie Warden
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cheri Arnsdorff + Jennifer Mendoza8271% games+16.2% vs expected
Hilary Brooks + Ashley Tipton3351% games+0.1% vs expected
Cheri Arnsdorff + Ketki Sheth4155% gamesnot enough data
Ashley Tipton + Savannah Johnson134 matchesnot enough data
Cheri Arnsdorff + Savannah Johnson123 matchesnot enough data
Hilary Brooks + Jennifer Mendoza303 matchesnot enough data
Hilary Brooks + Katharine Brosnan213 matchesnot enough data
Ashley Tipton + Jennifer Mendoza123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Olesiuk
28W–20L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
Mary Reid Martens
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%92%3%
2.74
Emily Miner
12W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
2.62
Hilary Brooks
26W–19L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%23%77%
2.60
Parker Casler
3W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
38%62%<1%
2.54
Jennifer Mendoza
24W–25L career · 7 lines in 2025
0%48%52%
2.51
Katharine Brosnan
21W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%56%44%
2.48
2.5
Audrey Stokely
3W–15L career · no lines in 2025
0%63%37%
2.45
2.5
Ashley Tipton
17W–19L career · 8 lines in 2025
0%70%30%
2.43
2.5
Cheri Arnsdorff
31W–20L career · 8 lines in 2025
0%79%21%
2.39
Ketki Sheth
15W–12L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%94%6%
2.29
3
Chelsea Grindstaff
1W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
94%6%<1%
2.28
Savannah Johnson
10W–19L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Katie Warden
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.