Teams

Cheval Smashionistas - J. Urban

2021 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over - Night · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over Women Night

11 players · average NTRP 3.21 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-03-23vs Hunters Green Mixed Nuts - Q. TonnuSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLorrie White / Jacqueline Hayes vs Tina Sturdevant / Nikki Spirakis1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPam Frost / Danielle Lindblom vs Hong Liu / Ines Ortiz6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesLorrie White / Lisa Crow vs Laura Fetters / Katie Krysa7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAngela Huber / Danielle Lindblom vs Louise Tedesco / Laurie Kleespies6-2, 7-6
2021-03-02vs Buckhorn - S. MosherLost 01
L#1 DoublesLorrie White / Lisa Crow vs Catherine Davidson / Carrie Deming3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2021-02-23vs Avila 3.0 RHRN - Y. ThomasWon 10
W#1 SinglesLorrie White vs Summer Patterson6-1, 6-0
W#1 DoublesLorrie White / Angela Huber vs Louise Tedesco / Monica Castaneda4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-02-09vs River Hills Double Shots - D. FlairSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAngela Huber / Lorrie White vs Dorothy Flair / Sarah Ayres6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesRobin Perrone / Danielle Lindblom vs Jen O'Leary / Becky Meidt2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2021-02-02Won 10
W#2 DoublesPam Frost / Danielle Lindblom vs Jenny Goad / Beatrice Weasche6-2, 6-1
L#1 DoublesJacqueline Hayes / Lorrie White vs Xue Chan / Wei Xue5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDanielle Lindblom / Robin Perrone vs Annmarie Iwanicki / Ines Ortiz6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesJacqueline Hayes / Danielle Lindblom vs Cuc Nguyen / Joan Whitten7-5, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 18 & Over Women Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Alex Jackson
published 3.5
Jacqueline Hayes
published 3.5
3.15
Lorrie White
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #1 Singles 14% · published 3.5
3.10
Lisa Crow
published
3.07
Nathalie Crane
published 3
3.00
Joanne Urban
published
2.87
Danielle Lindblom
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.81
Angela Huber
published 3
2.58
Robin Perrone
published
2.56
Anjali Singh
published 3
2.50
Pam Frost
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Alex Jackson
2W–3L career · no lines in 2021
<1%83%16%
3.37
3.5
Jacqueline Hayes
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Lorrie White
184W–124L career · 7 lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.15
Lisa Crow
14W–17L career · no lines in 2021
22%78%<1%
3.10
3
Nathalie Crane
56W–42L career · no lines in 2021
<1%28%72%
3.07
Joanne Urban
9W–6L career · no lines in 2021
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Danielle Lindblom
93W–106L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Angela Huber
3W–4L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%7%
2.81
Robin Perrone
9W–5L career · no lines in 2021
27%73%<1%
2.58
3
Anjali Singh
4W–8L career · no lines in 2021
33%67%<1%
2.56
Pam Frost
4W–9L career · no lines in 2021
48%52%<1%
2.50

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.