Teams

1BLOOM-SRINATH 4.5+M TEAM SINGLES FALL SEM

2023 SEM FALL TEAM SINGLES · MEN 4.5+ SINGLES SEM

5 players · average NTRP 4.50 / S.E. MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#2 SinglesDavid Lai vs Trenton Townsend4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesDavid Lai vs Chris Chirgwin6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesInbum Song vs John Hughes3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesRohit Srinath vs Nicholas Ludwig6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesInbum Song vs Mark Petit2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesBrendan Childress vs Brian Nguyen3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesDavid Lai vs Marlon Leone2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesInbum Song vs Bradley Silverman0-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesLukas Obel vs Jonathan Martin6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesBrendan Childress vs Nicholas Ludwig0-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesInbum Song vs Martin Bak4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesRohit Srinath vs Marlon Leone6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesLukas Obel vs Peter Wagner3-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesInbum Song vs Glenn Saperstein0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesLukas Obel vs Cheng Gong5-7, 1-6
W#2 SinglesRohit Srinath vs Yu Wang7-6, 6-2
W#3 SinglesDavid Lai vs Bradley Silverman6-4, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · MEN 4.5+ SINGLES SEM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
13LIFE-EDWARDS 4.5+M TEAM SINGLES FALL SEM7117719187
24EAST-KEAN capt 4.5+M TEAM SINGLES FALL SEM6217717162
36SCWB-KUROSAWA 4.5+M TEAM SINGLES FALL SEM35101429205
42DEER-TOWNSEND 4.5+M TEAM SINGLES FALL SEM3571735239
51BLOOM-SRINATH 4.5+M TEAM SINGLES FALL SEM1771739268

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.05 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

David Lai
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.24
Brendan Childress
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
3.86
Inbum Song
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 20% · published 4.5
Lukas Obel
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Rohit Srinath
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brendan Childress + David Lai213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
David Lai
20W–11L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Brendan Childress
46W–72L career · 2 lines in 2023
3%94%2%
4.24
4.5
Inbum Song
18W–38L career · 5 lines in 2023
86%14%<1%
3.86
Lukas Obel
5W–9L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Rohit Srinath
58W–23L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.