Teams

Martin

2022 Anne Arundel Mixed 40 & Over · Anne Arundel Mixed 40 & Over 7.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-08-18vs KochLost 01
L#2 DoublesDina Caddeo / Mark Trimmer vs Michael McGowan / Shelley Sturtz6-1, 5-7, 0-1
2022-08-14vs Walsh/JacobsonWon 21
L#1 DoublesBrandt Butcher / Mary Corbiere vs June Means / Brian Timian5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDina Caddeo / Mark Trimmer vs Kimberly Walko / Michael Herrera6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLisa Mendenhall / John Wehner vs Leann Gibbs / Tom Walsh7-5, 5-6
2022-08-12Won 10
W#3 DoublesDina Caddeo / Mark Trimmer vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-08-11vs Walsh/JacobsonLost 01
L#1 DoublesRebecca Sellassie / Scott Stickels vs Brian Timian / Sherry Orebaugh2-6, 3-6
2022-08-07vs KochLost 12
W#1 DoublesLisa Mendenhall / Jorge Paucar vs Scott A Green / Belinda McLean6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMary Corbiere / Richard Lucas vs David Mason / Shelley Sturtz6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDina Caddeo / Mark Trimmer vs Marie Sokoloff / Frank von Hendricks4-6, 2-6
2022-07-28vs KochLost 01
L#2 DoublesJenny Lopez / Scott Stickels vs Joshua Fretz / Simone Saunches4-6, 0-6
2022-07-17vs KochLost 01
L#2 DoublesDina Caddeo / Mark Trimmer vs David Mason / Shelley Sturtz6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2022-07-10vs Walsh/JacobsonWon 10
W#2 DoublesDina Caddeo / Mark Trimmer vs Kimberly Walko / Michael Chronister6-3, 6-2
2022-06-26vs Walsh/JacobsonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMary Corbiere / Richard Lucas vs Sherry Orebaugh / Brian Timian6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDina Caddeo / Mark Trimmer vs Kimberly Walko / Anthony Oliver6-3, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Mixed 40 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Lisa Mendenhall
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.46
Dina Caddeo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.27
Mesanie Lee
published
3.25
James Appel
published 3.5
3.18
Scott Stickels
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.15
Jorge Paucar
published
3.08
Rebecca Sellassie
published
2.85
Peggy Bailey
published
Greg Richardson
published 3
2.63
Mary Corbiere
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Richard Lucas
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Lisa Mendenhall
156W–76L career · type A · 2 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Dina Caddeo
138W–171L career · 12 lines in 2022
62%38%<1%
3.46
Mesanie Lee
26W–27L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
James Appel
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Scott Stickels
28W–68L career · 2 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
Jorge Paucar
7W–16L career · no lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
3.15
Rebecca Sellassie
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.08
Peggy Bailey
18W–17L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Greg Richardson
0W–5L career · type M · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Mary Corbiere
67W–149L career · 3 lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
2.63
Richard Lucas
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.