Teams

ALL JOHNSON/ROGERS

2025 FW Ladies 18 Social Doubles Summer League · Saturday Ladies 3.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-07-12vs TCU CARPENTERLost 12
W#1 DoublesJulie Davis / Jo Anne Golaz vs Caroline Archuleta / Keri Vaughn6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJulisa Melendez / Courtney Plumbley vs Melis Carpenter / Nanette Commerford4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLucy Johnson / Heather Varon vs Christina Jacobs / Katherine Swift6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2025-05-31vs TCU CARPENTERLost 03
L#1 DoublesKatherine Dickinson / Jo Anne Golaz vs Melis Carpenter / Nanette Commerford5-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKelly Kruse / Courtney Plumbley vs Bonnie Sudderth / Caitlyn Bastable2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLucy Johnson / Heather Varon vs Mary D'Alise / Keri Vaughn1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Saturday Ladies 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.86
Carolyn Rogers
published 3
2.85
Katherine Dickinson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.84
Allison Khan
published 3
2.74
Julisa Melendez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.65
Lucy Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Courtney Plumbley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.63
Jo Anne Golaz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.55
Tara Haraldson
published
2.25
Heather Varon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lucy Johnson + Heather Varon044 matchesnot enough data
Tara Haraldson + Heather Varon224 matchesnot enough data
Courtney Plumbley + Carolyn Rogers303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Carolyn Rogers
25W–17L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86
Katherine Dickinson
11W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.85
3
Allison Khan
36W–11L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
Julisa Melendez
12W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
2.74
Lucy Johnson
5W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
14%86%1%
2.65
3
Courtney Plumbley
5W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
2.63
Jo Anne Golaz
23W–46L career · 2 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
2.63
Tara Haraldson
14W–11L career · no lines in 2025
0%36%64%
2.55
Heather Varon
9W–36L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%96%4%
2.25

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.