Teams

Jackson/40/4.0/TRI/LCRC

2026 Lake Charles Tri Level 40 & Over - Women · 4.0,3.5,3.0 LC (40&O) Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-09vs Lanier/40/4.0/TRI/LCRCLost 03
L#1 DoublesLaurie Herrera / Julie Miller vs Lee Lanier / Jackie Heinen4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAudra Jackson / Vickie Anderson vs Erika Carlisle / Stephannie Tanner4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKelly Juneau / Tiffany Rutland vs Marlene Walker / Mona Hastings0-6, 3-6
2026-08-02vs Lanier/40/4.0/TRI/LCRCLost 03
L#1 DoublesLaurie Herrera / Carrie Watkins vs Lee Lanier / Melissa Padgett3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Istre / Vickie Anderson vs Liesl Rademeyer / Stephannie Tanner0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKelly Juneau / Tiffany Rutland vs Marlene Walker / Melissa Brown2-6, 0-6
2026-07-26vs Lanier/40/4.0/TRI/LCRCLost 12
W#1 DoublesJulie Miller / Laurie Herrera vs Lee Lanier / Carrie Kuehn6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesVickie Anderson / Carrie Watkins vs Nancy Clements / Liesl Rademeyer6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTiffany Rutland / Kelly Juneau vs Marlene Walker / Amber Comeaux0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.0,3.5,3.0 LC (40&O) Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Lanier/40/4.0/TRI/LCRC3081346
2Jackson/40/4.0/TRI/LCRC03181698

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Laurie Herrera
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Carrie Watkins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.28
Jennifer Istre
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Audra Jackson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Vickie Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Penny Misse
published
2.65
Kelly Juneau
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.62
Tiffany Rutland
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tiffany Rutland + Kelly Juneau3343% games+5.5% vs expected
Vickie Anderson + Audra Jackson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laurie Herrera
15W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.79
3.5
Carrie Watkins
11W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
Jennifer Istre
7W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Audra Jackson
16W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
Vickie Anderson
13W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
27%72%<1%
3.08
Penny Misse
41W–45L career · no lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
2.92
Kelly Juneau
13W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
2.65
Tiffany Rutland
11W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
2.62

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.