← Teams

THPRD-Shull

2020 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 4.07 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
Luke Filose
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.02
Aaron Stout
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
—
Sushil Srivastava
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.70
Justin Shull
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.64
Alex Rand
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.54
Jonathan Caplan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.46
Neil Soiffer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Results12 ties
2020-03-08Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesAlex Rand / Justin Shull vs Wiley Zhao / Steve Swan6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesNeil Soiffer / Michael Davis vs Duy Nguyen / Kevin Jarvis2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGreg Finnegan / Sushil Srivastava vs Tony Kalil / Jeff Hanson6-3, 6-4
2020-03-01Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesAlex Rand / Deepak Kumar vs Loc Hotan / Deepak Selvanathan6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesNeil Soiffer / Justin Shull vs Ajay Kumar Tippisetti / Santhanakrishnan Balakrishnan6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBill Jautz / Jonathan Caplan vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2020-02-23Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesLuke Filose / Greg Finnegan vs Brian Jones / Brian Brown6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJustin Shull / Michael Davis vs Paul Kerkar / Arthur Hung6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNeil Soiffer / Sushil Srivastava vs Thomas Carter / Tim Leatherman6-1, 6-4
2020-02-23Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesAlex Rand / Deepak Kumar vs Dave Cobban / Martin Schnappenberger7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNeil Soiffer / Michael Davis vs Stanley Mo / Tochukwu George6-3, 6-0
2020-02-16Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesLuke Filose / Greg Finnegan vs Joe Entler / Tim Campbell7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMichael Davis / Jonathan Caplan vs Joel Ankeny / Peter Brown6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAlex Rand / Deepak Kumar vs Terence Gariety / John Rake6-2, 3-0
2020-02-01Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesMichael Davis / Sushil Srivastava vs Ryan Every / Joel Pickard3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLuke Filose / Greg Finnegan vs Adam Gamboa / Jason Ruhmann7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJoe Voydat / Justin Shull vs Chris Collins / Quang Truong6-1, 6-2
2020-01-05Won 3–1
W#1 DoublesLuke Filose / Greg Finnegan vs Stanley Mo / Stefan Olander6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAlex Rand / Justin Shull vs Ed Stoner / Albert Hensley6-4, 6-1
L#2 SinglesAaron Stout vs Blair Thompson6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesNeil Soiffer / Deepak Kumar vs Joey Lin / Richard Jennings6-3, 6-1
2019-12-15Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesKelly Mohr / Luke Filose vs Stephanie Leeding / David Pham7-6, 7-5
2019-12-15Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesJing Feng / Justin Shull vs Alex Harbell / Michele Waite6-2, 6-2
2019-12-14Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesJustin Shull / Jinquan Wu vs Quyen Wong / Amy Bucher6-1, 6-3
2019-12-14Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesAaron Stout / Jinquan Wu vs Kirsten Holmes / Bryan Potter6-2, 6-1
2019-12-14Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesNeil Soiffer / Angie Lee vs Matt Simmering / Kristin Taylor6-1, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Luke Filose
106W–43L career
1%99%0%
4.17
4
Aaron Stout
55W–16L career
0%75%25%
4.02
4
Sushil Srivastava
46W–17L career
not enough data
—
4
Justin Shull
136W–38L career
2%98%0%
3.70
4
Alex Rand
56W–41L career
6%94%0%
3.64
4
Jonathan Caplan
37W–61L career
24%76%0%
3.54
4
Neil Soiffer
96W–138L career
44%56%0%
3.46

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.