Teams

8.0 Team

2025 65 & Over League · Women 8.0 - 65 & Over

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MONTANA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-07-24vs Montana/Miller/65&OverLost 03
L#1 DoublesMary Bursack / Terri Ruthruff vs Sarah Miller / Willa Craig4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCheryl Scott / Ginger Blevins vs Colleen Green / Jean Clary3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMartha Yates / Patricia Torgerson vs Shelley Geiszler / Susan Litherland7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2025-07-23vs Montana/Miller/65&OverLost 03
L#1 DoublesMartha Yates / Patricia Torgerson vs Shelley Geiszler / Susan Litherland2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSandrah MacK / Sally Lentz vs Margaret Moffatt / Elizabeth Brennan4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAnne Caprio / DIANA RAIMONDO vs Gatchina Hessler / Jan DeCosse4-6, 2-6
2025-07-16vs Montana/Miller/65&OverLost 02
L#1 DoublesAnne Caprio / DIANA RAIMONDO vs Gatchina Hessler / Jan DeCosse1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesGinger Blevins / Cheryl Scott vs Colleen Green / Jean Clary3-6, 4-6
2025-06-18vs Montana/Miller/65&OverLost 03
L#1 DoublesMary Bursack / Terri Ruthruff vs Willa Craig / Sarah Miller6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSally Lentz / Martha Yates vs Elizabeth Brennan / Margaret Moffatt7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAnne Caprio / DIANA RAIMONDO vs Gatchina Hessler / Jan DeCosse4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 8.0 - 65 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Montana/Miller/65&Over40120380
28.0 Team0401224145

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Anne Caprio
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.38
Terri Ruthruff
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Cheryl Scott
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.24
DIANA RAIMONDO
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Ginger Blevins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Martha Yates
published
Mary Bursack
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Patricia Torgerson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Sally Lentz
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Sandrah MacK
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ginger Blevins + Cheryl Scott0535% gamesnot enough data
Sandrah MacK + Sally Lentz314 matchesnot enough data
DIANA RAIMONDO + Anne Caprio033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Anne Caprio
6W–10L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%79%20%
3.38
3.5
Terri Ruthruff
94W–44L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Cheryl Scott
16W–29L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.26
3.5
DIANA RAIMONDO
39W–50L career · 6 lines in 2025
4%92%3%
3.24
Ginger Blevins
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Martha Yates
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Bursack
11W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Patricia Torgerson
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sally Lentz
12W–20L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sandrah MacK
21W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.