Teams

MSIL A18&O 3.0W Blackledge-Champaign

2026 MSIL Adult 18 & Over -MSIL East League · East MSIL A18&O 3.0W

11 players · average NTRP 2.92 / MID-SOUTH ILLINOIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-29vs MSIL A18&O 3.0W HartmanLost 05
L#1 DoublesDebra Carlson / Jie Li vs Whitney Hartman / Megan Konar4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesSandra Roesler vs Emily Hurth0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAnna Blackledge / Maryanna Parker vs Leslie Hartman / Stephanie Tresslar0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCandy Leti / Michelle Erickson vs Meredith Mills / Tamsyn Gilbert6-0, 3-6, 0-1
L#4 DoublesJoan Tousey / Christina Fazio vs Lynn Timmons / Beth Arndt0-6, 0-6
2026-06-22vs MSIL A18&O 3.0W HartmanLost 14
L#1 DoublesDebra Carlson / Amanda Ogden vs Whitney Hartman / Stephanie Tresslar2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesSandra Roesler vs Tifani Moot4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJie Li / Jeongmin Kim vs Lynn Timmons / Erin Tracy2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDebbie Hortin / Candy Leti vs Leslie Hartman / Beth Arndt3-6, 1-6
L#4 DoublesChristina Fazio / Michelle Erickson vs Katy Lane / Janelle Lunney2-6, 2-6
2026-06-01vs MSIL A18&O 3.0W HartmanLost 14
L#1 DoublesAmanda Ogden / Maryanna Parker vs Amy Armstrong / Erin Tracy3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesAnna Blackledge vs Stephanie Tresslar0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJie Li / Jeongmin Kim vs Beth Arndt / Tamara Helfer6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDebbie Hortin / Michelle Erickson vs Tamsyn Gilbert / Megan Konar6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#4 DoublesCandy Leti / Joan Tousey vs Katy Leman / Meredith Mills3-6, 0-6
2026-05-21vs MSIL A18&O 3.0W HartmanLost 13
L#1 SinglesAnna Blackledge vs Tifani Moot4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDebbie Hortin / Maryanna Parker vs Stephanie Tresslar / Megan Konar3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCandy Leti / Christina Fazio vs Katy Leman / Janelle Lunney0-6, 0-6
W#4 DoublesJie Li / Jeongmin Kim vs Katy Lane / Beth Arndt6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2026-05-18vs MSIL A18&O 3.0W HartmanLost 13
L#1 DoublesDebra Carlson / Sandra Roesler vs Stephanie Tresslar / Amy Armstrong1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAnna Blackledge / Maryanna Parker vs JOOYEN KIM / Tifani Moot1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJoan Tousey / Amanda Ogden vs Tamsyn Gilbert / Erin Tracy2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#4 DoublesJeongmin Kim / Jie Li vs Janelle Lunney / Colleen Murphy6-3, 6-0
2026-05-11vs MSIL A18&O 3.0W HartmanLost 03
L#1 DoublesDebra Carlson / Sandra Roesler vs Emily Hurth / Beth Arndt2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesAnna Blackledge / Maryanna Parker vs Leslie Hartman / JOOYEN KIM2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJoan Tousey / Christina Fazio vs Whitney Hartman / Tifani Moot0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for East MSIL A18&O 3.0W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.50 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Jie Li
usually #4 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.76
Michelle Erickson
usually #4 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.63
Debbie Hortin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.54
Maryanna Parker
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.50
Debra Carlson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.46
Sandra Roesler
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.42
Anna Blackledge
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
2.40
Joan Tousey
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
2.35
Candy Leti
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.35
Christina Fazio
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.24
Amanda Ogden
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debbie Hortin + Joan Tousey1443% gamesnot enough data
Anna Blackledge + Maryanna Parker033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jie Li
4W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.89
Michelle Erickson
23W–69L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Debbie Hortin
11W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
15%84%<1%
2.63
Maryanna Parker
0W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
2.54
3
Debra Carlson
3W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
2.50
Sandra Roesler
3W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
61%39%<1%
2.46
3
Anna Blackledge
3W–14L career · type A · 5 lines in 2026
74%26%<1%
2.42
Joan Tousey
8W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
78%22%<1%
2.40
3
Candy Leti
0W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
87%13%<1%
2.35
3
Christina Fazio
0W–6L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
88%12%<1%
2.35
2.5
Amanda Ogden
1W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.24

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.