Teams

GEPTA-4.0-Adult/40+M(KIM)(FB)

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA ADULT 40 & OVER LEAGUE

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / GEPTA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2025 USA ADULT 40 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Mike Caldarella
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #1 Doubles 39% · published
John Moore
published 4
3.74
Andres Enriquez
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 4
3.69
Aaron Setliff
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.25
Roger Gonzalez
usually #3 Doubles 39%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Elzie Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Joseph Kuti
usually #1 Singles 30%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
MIN KIM
usually #1 Doubles 62%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Michael Bezemek
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
Miguel Pantoja
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Ralu Hinojos
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Rodolfo Gandarilla
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
Soto Armando
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Timothy Vida
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Roger Gonzalez + Elzie Johnson3353% games+9.9% vs expected
Ralu Hinojos + Rodolfo Gandarilla4749% gamesnot enough data
MIN KIM + Andres Enriquez5260% gamesnot enough data
Roger Gonzalez + MIN KIM213 matchesnot enough data
MIN KIM + Elzie Johnson303 matchesnot enough data
Andres Enriquez + Soto Armando033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mike Caldarella
41W–40L career · 33 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
John Moore
no matches on record · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Andres Enriquez
26W–26L career · 11 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.74
4
Aaron Setliff
14W–27L career · 11 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
Roger Gonzalez
82W–59L career · 18 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.25
Elzie Johnson
124W–75L career · 28 lines in 2025
not enough data
Joseph Kuti
25W–14L career · 19 lines in 2025
not enough data
MIN KIM
102W–80L career · 29 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Bezemek
96W–84L career · 28 lines in 2025
not enough data
Miguel Pantoja
17W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ralu Hinojos
51W–38L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rodolfo Gandarilla
62W–59L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
Soto Armando
32W–14L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Timothy Vida
10W–43L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.