Teams

BHSC-Sechser

2023 Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over Men · Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 4.40 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-05-15vs ACAC-DellimoreWon 10
W#3 DoublesMark Raffinan / Todd Sechser vs Harris Haynie / Ramzi Talhouk6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2023-05-08vs ACAC-DellimoreSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMark Raffinan / Joshua Eby vs Greg Benham / Ramzi Talhouk6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesBrandon Schartz / Thomas Weck vs Chike Dellimore / Craig Ellis4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-05-01vs ACAC-DellimoreWon 10
W#3 DoublesBrandon Schartz / Thomas Weck vs Chike Dellimore / JOSEPH MATHERS7-6, 6-7, 1-0
2023-04-24vs ACAC-DellimoreWon 10
W#1 DoublesWescott Blemker / Mark Raffinan vs Amit Shahane / Harris Haynie6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2023-04-17vs ACAC-DellimoreWon 10
W#2 DoublesDaniel Carlson / Thomas Weck vs Greg Benham / Amit Shahane6-4, 6-4
2023-04-10vs ACAC-DellimoreWon 10
W#3 DoublesThomas Weck / Mark Raffinan vs Jordan Barr / Thibault Gautier6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.19 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.40
Todd Sechser
published
4.26
Andrew Juge
published 4.5
Daniel Carlson
published 4.5
4.23
Brandon Schartz
published 4.5
4.23
Jay Bolus
published
4.21
Mark Raffinan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.17
Wescott Blemker
published
4.04
Thomas Weck
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
4.01
Robert Cueva
published
John McNeil
published
Joshua Eby
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Thomas Weck + Mark Raffinan6164% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Todd Sechser
14W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
4.40
4.5
Andrew Juge
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
2%95%3%
4.26
4.5
Daniel Carlson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Brandon Schartz
6W–4L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
4.23
Jay Bolus
5W–1L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
4.23
4.5
Mark Raffinan
72W–30L career · 4 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
4.21
Wescott Blemker
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
10%90%1%
4.17
4
Thomas Weck
69W–44L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%39%61%
4.04
Robert Cueva
8W–5L career · no lines in 2023
46%54%<1%
4.01
John McNeil
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Joshua Eby
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.