Teams

Pohlmann - RS Clay

2024 Escambia Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed 18 & Over

11 players · average NTRP 3.67 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-08-07vs Wallace - RS ClaySplit 11
W#1 DoublesVictor Agadzi / Marina Agadzi vs Mecy Wimberly / John Wimberly6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesVan Hughes / Addison van Pelt vs Andrew Hillman / Susan Bonsignore6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2024-07-31vs Abel - RS ClayLost 01
L#3 DoublesLockland Tyler / Katie Cooper-Bussell vs Craig Abel / Cherie Tan1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-07-24vs Schweigert - PCCLost 01
L#2 DoublesLockland Tyler / Katie Cooper-Bussell vs Lisa Andresen / Steven Bingert2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-07-23vs Escambia/Tran/18&Over7.0MXDLost 02
L#1 DoublesVictor Agadzi / Marina Agadzi vs Kyle Wilson / Megan Zimmerman6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAddison van Pelt / Van Hughes vs Clay Anderson / KIMBERLY ANDREWS3-6, 4-6
2024-07-10vs Wilson - PCCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLockland Tyler / Katie Cooper-Bussell vs Sandra Wilson / Michael Yager3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesVictor Agadzi / Marina Agadzi vs Eric Rasmussen / Wendy McCullar6-1, 6-2
2024-07-03vs Struck - RS HardLost 01
L#1 DoublesLockland Tyler / Emily Young vs Josh Sitton / Caroline Struck2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Abigail Nelson
published 4.5
3.66
Lockland Tyler
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.59
Marina Agadzi
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.38
Van Hughes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Troy Gill
published
3.14
3.11
Hassan Al-Ansari
published
2.99
Addison van Pelt
published 3
2.92
Victor Agadzi
published
2.86
Zach Pohlmann
published
Marie Steen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katie Cooper-Bussell + Zach Pohlmann303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Abigail Nelson
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
4.29
Lockland Tyler
47W–37L career · 4 lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.66
Marina Agadzi
42W–59L career · 7 lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.59
3.5
Van Hughes
83W–83L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.38
Troy Gill
5W–13L career · no lines in 2024
15%84%1%
3.15
Katie Cooper-Bussell
16W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%16%84%
3.14
Hassan Al-Ansari
5W–7L career · no lines in 2024
21%78%<1%
3.11
3
Addison van Pelt
15W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%54%46%
2.99
Victor Agadzi
7W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
2.92
Zach Pohlmann
12W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
2.86
Marie Steen
1W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.