Teams

HU - King

2025 USTA League Adult 55 & Over - Fall 2024 - HSV · 3.5 MEN 55N3D

12 players · average NTRP 3.57 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-11-25vs Perry Fall 2024Won 21
L#1 DoublesConrad Meyer / Craig Hovan vs Andrew Devine / Ben Donahue3-3
W#2 DoublesScott Averbuch / Alan Spearman vs John Wilkes / David Perry6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDavid Chandler / Thomas Strickland vs Charles Westcott / Michael Howerton6-2
2024-11-23vs Mann 55+ Fall2025Won 20
W#1 DoublesCraig Hovan / Karl King vs Thomas Taylor / Thomas Freedman6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAlan Spearman / Scott Averbuch vs Aaron Veltkamp / Kirk Scruggs6-3, 6-2
2024-11-21vs TextorWon 20
W#1 DoublesDavid Simmons / Anthony Glover vs Michael French / Timothy Murphy3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPaul Carothers / Craig Hovan vs Joey Fiore / Richard Textor4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-11-16vs PerezmenWon 20
W#1 DoublesScott Averbuch / Alan Spearman vs Jesse Cook III / Peter Weiland6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCraig Hovan / Michael Lee vs David Perez / Kevin Jose6-2, 6-1
2024-11-12vs Reasner 55+Split 11
W#1 DoublesClay Doss / David Chandler vs Dennis Reasner / Tom Estes6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesTim Bishop / Paul Carothers vs Robert Coffey / Blake Herrin6-7, 2-6
2024-10-23vs Mann 55+ Fall2025Won 30
W#1 DoublesMichael Lee / Anthony Glover vs Thomas Freedman / Aaron Veltkamp6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTim Bishop / Paul Carothers vs Robert Walters / Stephen Waring6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesConrad Meyer / Thomas Strickland vs Frank Craig / James Smelser6-1, 6-1
2024-10-20vs TextorWon 20
W#1 DoublesDavid Chandler / David Simmons vs Timothy Murphy / Drew Watts6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCraig Hovan / Michael Lee vs Michael French / Yancy York7-5, 6-4
2024-10-09vs PerezmenWon 30
W#1 DoublesPaul Carothers / Tim Bishop vs Ricky Llewellyn / Kevin Kennedy6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesClay Doss / David Chandler vs David Perez / Tom Armstrong6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAlan Spearman / Michael Lee vs Bill Reaves / John Pope6-2, 6-0
2024-10-08vs Reasner 55+Won 30
W#1 DoublesPaul Carothers / Tim Bishop vs Dennis Reasner / Tom Estes6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCraig Hovan / Conrad Meyer vs JON HARMEYER / Blake Herrin6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesScott Averbuch / Anthony Glover vs Mickey Tidmore / Matthew Wolfsberger6-2, 6-3
2024-10-06vs Perry Fall 2024Won 30
W#1 DoublesDavid Chandler / Clay Doss vs Parker Altice / Andrew Devine6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAlan Spearman / Scott Averbuch vs David Perry / Charles Westcott6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCraig Hovan / Karl King vs Jeff Tate / Michael Howerton6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 MEN 55N3D have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Anthony Glover
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.58
Clay Doss
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.52
Craig Hovan
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.48
Alan Spearman
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.41
Paul Carothers
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
3.39
Karl King
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.27
David Simmons
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Conrad Meyer
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
David Chandler
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.20
Scott Averbuch
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.08
Tim Bishop
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Thomas Strickland
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alan Spearman + Scott Averbuch8170% games+8.6% vs expected
Paul Carothers + Tim Bishop11852% games−2.3% vs expected
Clay Doss + David Chandler8165% gamesnot enough data
David Simmons + Anthony Glover4160% gamesnot enough data
Alan Spearman + Conrad Meyer3252% gamesnot enough data
Karl King + Craig Hovan404 matchesnot enough data
David Simmons + Karl King213 matchesnot enough data
Clay Doss + Thomas Strickland303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anthony Glover
10W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Clay Doss
39W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.58
3.5
Craig Hovan
76W–52L career · type A · 7 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.52
3.5
Alan Spearman
18W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%56%43%
3.48
Paul Carothers
17W–24L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.41
Karl King
66W–39L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
David Simmons
16W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Conrad Meyer
14W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
David Chandler
13W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.24
Scott Averbuch
11W–3L career · 5 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Tim Bishop
13W–25L career · 6 lines in 2025
28%71%<1%
3.08
Thomas Strickland
9W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.