Teams

Sterling (Neighborhood Tennis)

2023 Miami-Dade Adult 40 & Over - Spring Day · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.07 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-04-21vs Svanstrom (Continental)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesChie-Mie Chyung vs Djamilia Junco0-6, 5-7
L#4 DoublesPamela Garrison / Patricia Nathan vs Lydia Puente / Ilona Anderson6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2023-03-17vs TeamForman (Riviera Prep)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesGloria Suarez-Sanchez / Chie-Mie Chyung vs Heidi Funke / Lirian Dondo5-7, 2-6
2023-03-10vs Terrazas (Morgan Levy Park)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesChie-Mie Chyung / Jenifer Reimi vs Yersika Fernandez Labrador / Carol Ortiz4-6, 3-6
2023-02-03vs Svanstrom (Continental)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesPamela Garrison / Patricia Nathan vs Lucia Soria / Chantal Salnave4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Carolina Backes
published 3.5
2.83
Patricia Nathan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
2.77
2.74
Holly Lopez
published 3
2.72
Dolores Cuquejo
published 3
2.71
Shari Steinberg
published
2.65
Rosemarie Sterling
published
2.60
IRMA CAMARENA
published 3
2.58
2.54
AnaElena Multach
published 3
2.47
Chie-Mie Chyung
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.41
Pamela Hartmann
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maria Angelica Sintes + Gloria Suarez-Sanchez2348% games−1.8% vs expected
Pamela Hartmann + IRMA CAMARENA1438% games−4.5% vs expected
Patricia Nathan + Chie-Mie Chyung123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carolina Backes
21W–21L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.41
Patricia Nathan
28W–44L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%89%10%
2.83
3
Gloria Suarez-Sanchez
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Holly Lopez
3W–8L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Dolores Cuquejo
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.72
Shari Steinberg
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
2.71
Rosemarie Sterling
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
2.65
3
IRMA CAMARENA
3W–13L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
2.60
Maria Angelica Sintes
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
2.58
3
AnaElena Multach
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
2.54
3
Chie-Mie Chyung
26W–85L career · type A · 3 lines in 2023
59%41%<1%
2.47
Pamela Hartmann
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
75%25%<1%
2.41

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.