Teams

GAC RED

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-09-07vs PH ORANGESplit 11
L#1 DoublesMarcy Yonker / Jenna Keirns vs Karen Calderone / Kennedi Pettofrezzo6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Barnacle / Kristin Campbell vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-08-31vs KC-CC YELLOWLost 12
L#1 DoublesMarcy Yonker / Jenna Keirns vs Jody Dart / Susan Conroy6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMary Loughran vs Fernanda Jacques6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCarol Thornock / Laura Theiss vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-08-24vs SS-H GREENWon 20
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Barnacle / Marcy Yonker vs Christine Brekke / Marty Oliver6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMary Loughran vs Valerie Norris6-0, 6-1
2023-08-19vs LTFC YELLOWWon 20
W#1 DoublesCarol Thornock / Susan Aird vs Nancy Brooks / Danielle Havard6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMary Loughran vs Courtney Fabrizio7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2023-08-10vs LEBTC YELLOWSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSusan Aird / Mary Loughran vs Sarah Phillips / Kristine Maleri6-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Barnacle / Lynelle Zabel vs Rebecca Duque / Lisa McGavern7-5, 6-1
2023-08-06vs KC-RH BLUESplit 11
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Barnacle / Lynelle Zabel vs Inge Bentz / Jodi Thomas6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesMary Loughran vs Brenna Simpson3-6, 2-6
2023-08-03vs LTFC NAVYLost 01
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Barnacle / Marcy Yonker vs Dori Yaworski / Tracy Bourque5-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Mary Loughran
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.86
Laura Theiss
published
3.72
Carol Thornock
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.70
Laura Waldman
published
3.67
Elizabeth Barnacle
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.63
Marcy Yonker
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.39
Lynelle Zabel
published
Susan Aird
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marcy Yonker + Carol Thornock3256% gamesnot enough data
Carol Thornock + Elizabeth Barnacle213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Mary Loughran
28W–41L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
3.87
Laura Theiss
17W–10L career · no lines in 2023
1%84%15%
3.86
4
Carol Thornock
63W–55L career · 2 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
Laura Waldman
16W–36L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Elizabeth Barnacle
109W–78L career · 5 lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Marcy Yonker
48W–85L career · 4 lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.63
Lynelle Zabel
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
79%21%<1%
3.39
Susan Aird
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.