Teams

TYCC Yacht by Nature - L. Davitt

2022 Hillsborough Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over Day- Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.30 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 SinglesMonica Barkett vs Lara Saade6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLindsay Davitt / Courtney Steiner vs Mary Dunlap / Elizabeth Provenzano3-6, 3-6
2022-05-23vs Palma Ceia Penn Pals - N. GomezSplit 11
L#1 SinglesMonica Barkett vs Nicole Mulrooney2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesLindsay Davitt / Lauren Green vs Bobbi Royak / Amy Tamargo7-5, 6-3
2022-05-09vs River Hills Raquettes - J. O'LearyLost 01
L#2 DoublesLindsay Davitt / Mary Beth Courier vs Wendy Liller / Jen O'Leary2-6, 0-6
2022-05-02vs FH Matchmakers - D. LinthicumLost 01
L#2 DoublesLindsay Davitt / Lauren Green vs Carlee Revoy / Erin Posey6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLindsay Davitt / Mary Beth Courier vs Lisa Nero / Candace Austrich4-6, 0-6
2022-04-04vs Palma Ceia Penn Pals - N. GomezLost 01
L#3 DoublesLindsay Davitt / Molly James vs Bobbi Royak / Jessica Regan1-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over Day- Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Monica Barkett
usually #1 Singles 44%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 4
3.28
Jennifer Harrell
published
3.16
Courtney Steiner
published 3.5
2.96
Monica la Puente
published
2.96
Nichole Vogt
published
2.96
Lauren Green
published
2.95
Amy Hale
published 3
2.95
Lindsay Davitt
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.78
Mary Beth Courier
published
2.76
Shannon Roark
published
2.73
Ali Garrity
published 3
2.68
Stephanie Rumbley
published
2.57
Sarah Weaver
published
2.08
Molly James
published
Joelle Bertozzi
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Green + Lindsay Davitt314 matchesnot enough data
Lauren Green + Amy Hale213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Monica Barkett
239W–135L career · 9 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
Jennifer Harrell
5W–6L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Courtney Steiner
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.16
Monica la Puente
7W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%63%37%
2.96
Nichole Vogt
9W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%63%37%
2.96
Lauren Green
6W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
2.96
3
Amy Hale
8W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Lindsay Davitt
87W–66L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
2.95
Mary Beth Courier
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.78
Shannon Roark
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Ali Garrity
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
Stephanie Rumbley
10W–7L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
2.68
Sarah Weaver
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
2.57
Molly James
10W–8L career · no lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Joelle Bertozzi
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.