Teams

Morillo 18 3.5

2025 South East Tennis Singles 18 & Over League · 3.5 Men 18 & Over

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-02-26vs MatthewsWon 21
W#1 SinglesKevin Cogan vs Chris Heller1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJason Ingraham vs Ward Coleman7-6, 6-1
L#3 SinglesRamon Aristy vs Rick Parrotte3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesRyan Skane vs Chad Corbin3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJason Ingraham vs Parker Vukich6-4, 6-1
W#3 SinglesNicolas Morillo vs Will Breeden6-3, 6-2
2025-02-12vs MatthewsWon 30
W#1 SinglesLaurence Nadeau vs Jack Teeter6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesKevin Cogan vs Ward Coleman6-3, 6-3
W#3 SinglesRamon Aristy vs Daniel Adams6-2, 6-4
2025-02-05vs Worman 3.5 18+Won 10
W#3 SinglesZachary Manfredi vs Pahoran Dasilva6-2, 7-5
W#1 SinglesZachary Manfredi vs Travis Dant6-2, 6-2
2025-01-25Won 10
W#1 SinglesZachary Manfredi vs Clyde Nance7-5, 6-0
W#1 SinglesAlex Armeni vs Chad Corbin6-1, 6-4
W#2 SinglesKevin Cogan vs Chad Fortun6-2, 6-2
W#3 SinglesJason Ingraham vs Edward Everett3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Laurence Nadeau
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.81
Zachary Manfredi
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 4
3.73
Alex Armeni
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.71
Jason Ingraham
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
3.49
Kevin Cogan
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.42
Ryan Skane
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.35
Nick Basta
published
3.16
Nicolas Morillo
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
3.12
Ramon Aristy
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #3 Singles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nicolas Morillo + Ramon Aristy8261% games+9.3% vs expected
Laurence Nadeau + Nick Basta4449% games+3.7% vs expected
Nicolas Morillo + Kevin Cogan4353% games+0.6% vs expected
Laurence Nadeau + Nicolas Morillo303 matchesnot enough data
Ramon Aristy + Kevin Cogan123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laurence Nadeau
22W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Zachary Manfredi
108W–51L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.81
4
Alex Armeni
21W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Jason Ingraham
21W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
Kevin Cogan
54W–36L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.49
Ryan Skane
33W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.42
Nick Basta
32W–50L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
Nicolas Morillo
50W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16
Ramon Aristy
67W–37L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.12

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.