Teams

MTC Long

2025 Richmond Mixed 40 & Over · Richmond Mixed 40 & Over 8.0

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-09vs HCC ShrinerLost 01
L#1 DoublesLaurie Miller / David Whitall vs Aynsley Fisher / Todd Furbee2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-07-07vs 8.0 Morgan-Huguenot ParkLost 02
L#1 DoublesDavid Whitall / Jennifer Thaxton vs Don Busick / Lindsay Hardage6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDouglas Scammell / Lindsey Scammell vs Lara Hansen / Warren Smigo4-6, 3-6
2025-06-24vs Raintree EarlWon 10
W#1 DoublesDouglas Scammell / Lindsey Scammell vs Stacy Lukanuski / William Bryan6-3, 7-5
2025-06-18vs ACAC HatcherLost 12
L#1 DoublesYalier Fuster / Olena Turner vs Shari Litow / David Aschheim7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRobert Long / Jennifer Thaxton vs Grace Kim / Eddie Kim1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesRobin Meyer / Paul Haley vs Anne Saunier / Ken Hatcher6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-06-12vs Double Shots - BoschLost 02
L#2 DoublesLaurie Miller / David Whitall vs Alicia Watkins / Naveen Chennupati2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDouglas Scammell / Lindsey Scammell vs Sonya Carman / Almedin Muminovic6-7, 6-1, 0-1
2025-06-04vs Burkwood Stewart 40Lost 02
L#1 DoublesLindsey Scammell / Douglas Scammell vs Modestine Carter / Chris Gillam7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDavid Whitall / Robin Meyer vs Ashley Hart / Brady Smith3-6, 0-6
2025-05-23vs Westwood KellyLost 02
L#1 DoublesLindsey Scammell / Douglas Scammell vs Elizabeth Kelly / Harry Turton3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Budlong / David Whitall vs Lauren Jones / Dutch Jones2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 40 & Over 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Douglas Scammell
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.66
Craik Goodspeed
published 4
3.60
David Whitall
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.34
Yalier Fuster
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Laurie Miller
published
3.30
Paul Haley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Lindsey Scammell
published
3.08
Robin Meyer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jennifer Thaxton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Karen Budlong
published
Olena Turner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Nothnagle
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Douglas Scammell
100W–57L career · type A · 5 lines in 2025
<1%77%22%
3.89
4
Craik Goodspeed
0W–6L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.66
4
David Whitall
78W–80L career · 5 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.60
Yalier Fuster
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
87%13%<1%
3.34
Laurie Miller
2W–9L career · no lines in 2025
91%9%<1%
3.32
Paul Haley
27W–29L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
3.30
Lindsey Scammell
23W–18L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Robin Meyer
14W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.08
Jennifer Thaxton
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Karen Budlong
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Olena Turner
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Susan Nothnagle
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.