Teams

LLW SGV All's Good- Wu- Scholl Canyon/SU10

2021 SoCal Doubles 18 & Over - San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Women 4.5

10 players · average NTRP 4.42 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-11-20vs SGV Dare Doubles W4.5- Wang-WN/SA2Split 11
W#1 DoublesMika Katsuhara / Tai Sisson vs Jennifer Avila / Cara Hofstad6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLily Wu / Lauren DiFazio vs Ying Li / Amy Liang2-6, 5-7
W#1 DoublesMichelle Zhong / Lauren DiFazio vs Diana Laguna / Khin Aye6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTricia Guinto / Elaine Patterson vs Jennifer Avila / Lauren Lifson6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLily Wu / Tai Sisson vs Jane Wang / Khin Aye6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMichelle Zhong / Lauren DiFazio vs Jane Wang / Jasmine Dai6-0, 6-1
2021-10-03Won 10
W#1 DoublesMichelle Zhong / Stella Ko vs Amy Liang / Lauren Lifson7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTricia Guinto / Ashley Oyakawa vs Ying Li / Diana Laguna6-2, 6-2
2021-09-19Lost 01
L#2 DoublesWenli Chen / Lauren DiFazio vs Amy Liang / Lauren Lifson1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Women 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.11 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.53
Lauren DiFazio
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
4.35
Tai Sisson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Cheryl Park
published 4.5
4.24
Tricia Guinto
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.19
Stella Ko
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.09
Jennifer Portillo
published
4.02
Ashley Oyakawa
published 4.5
3.97
Lily Wu
published
3.87
Wenli Chen
published
3.76
Carol Choy
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren DiFazio + Tai Sisson3349% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren DiFazio
122W–58L career · 4 lines in 2021
42%58%<1%
4.53
4.5
Tai Sisson
249W–74L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%87%13%
4.35
4.5
Cheryl Park
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4.5
Tricia Guinto
124W–84L career · 2 lines in 2021
3%94%2%
4.24
4.5
Stella Ko
85W–31L career · 1 line in 2021
8%92%1%
4.19
Jennifer Portillo
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
23%76%<1%
4.09
4.5
Ashley Oyakawa
1W–3L career · no lines in 2021
43%57%<1%
4.02
Lily Wu
3W–7L career · no lines in 2021
58%42%<1%
3.97
Wenli Chen
5W–10L career · no lines in 2021
85%15%<1%
3.87
4
Carol Choy
111W–52L career · no lines in 2021
2%95%3%
3.76

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.