Teams

IE-APTC-Ruby Villanueva

2021 SCTA Doubles 18 & Over - IE · IE Women 3.5

4 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-11-14vs IE-VMHS-Joanne HarnedLost 02
L#1 DoublesJannah Carrasco / Marisa Gauss vs Becky Gagnon / Rhonda Arendt4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNanette Pratini / Ethel Manley vs Briana Masters / Sandy Wible3-6, 6-7
2021-11-07vs IE-CCCC-Sesilie Kay/Amy TaylorLost 01
L#2 DoublesNanette Pratini / Dionna Growsky vs Jeannie Adair / Amy Taylor3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2021-10-31vs IE-LLW-Ellen YarterLost 02
L#1 DoublesNanette Pratini / Ruby Villanueva vs Charlotte Pereira Reisch / Mara Watkins0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJannah Carrasco / Ethel Manley vs Kerri Munson / Jill Mastroluca7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2021-10-24vs IE-CL-Nancy ContrerasLost 01
L#1 DoublesJannah Carrasco / Connie DeLong vs Melissa Connor / Michelle Porter0-4
2021-09-26vs IE-MVHS-Elvira Schlanger/Leslie A.Lost 02
L#1 DoublesConnie DeLong / Jannah Carrasco vs Leslie Martin / Patricia Quinn4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDionna Growsky / Nanette Pratini vs Elvira Schlanger / Lorette Oliver6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2021-09-19vs IE-MTC-Jeanne ShelterLost 02
L#1 DoublesJannah Carrasco / Nanette Pratini vs Heather Toth / Judy Henning1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJane Magro / Ruby Villanueva vs Rebecca Cloyd / Amary-Gail Perfecto1-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for IE Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Jane Magro
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Jannah Carrasco
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.35
Connie DeLong
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Nanette Pratini
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jane Magro + Jannah Carrasco5650% gamesnot enough data
Connie DeLong + Jannah Carrasco2452% gamesnot enough data
Connie DeLong + Nanette Pratini213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jane Magro
73W–54L career · 1 line in 2021
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Jannah Carrasco
84W–81L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%87%12%
3.35
3.5
Connie DeLong
49W–49L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Nanette Pratini
28W–44L career · 5 lines in 2021
34%66%<1%
3.06

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.