Teams

MO-REG-Kim/40&OverMixed7.0

40 & Over Mixed- Sept. 22-24 · 7.0 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NEBRASKA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings8 teams · 7.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HOA-REG-Craig/40&Over7.0MXD000000
2IA-REG-Avilez000000
3KS-REG-Seitz/Ritter/40&OverMixed7.0000000
4NE-REG-Erwin/Tong000000
5OK-Reg-Doughty-Wood000000
6STL-REG-Risley-Winn/40&Over7.0MXD000000
7MO-REG-Kim/40&OverMixed7.0000000
8WC-REG-Strawhecker000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Benjamin Mowris
published 4
Carol Mailes
published 4
Dennis Mailes
published 4
3.75
Hee-Sun Kim
published 4
3.01
Jane Gardner
published
Brent Morris
published
Kara Spiva
published
Tony Roldan
published
Xingping Sun
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dennis Mailes + Carol Mailes13958% gamesnot enough data
Dennis Mailes + Jane Gardner14071% gamesnot enough data
Hee-Sun Kim + Tony Roldan224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Benjamin Mowris
25W–20L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Carol Mailes
55W–24L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Dennis Mailes
33W–13L career · type T · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Hee-Sun Kim
85W–75L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.75
Jane Gardner
57W–40L career · no lines in 2023
46%54%<1%
3.01
Brent Morris
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kara Spiva
36W–26L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tony Roldan
17W–26L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Xingping Sun
13W–15L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.