Teams

SS-D GREEN

2023 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 6.0 - 55 & OVER

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-06-23vs CP YELLOWLost 02
L#1 DoublesIrene Scott / Carole LaBounty vs Deborah Clark / Julie Schindler3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKari Graham / Linda Backus vs Susan Pesso / Cyndie Miller3-6, 1-6
2023-06-09Won 10
W#2 DoublesCarole LaBounty / Irene Scott vs Katherine Koch / Anne Lesko6-2, 6-1
2023-06-07vs VC BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesCarole LaBounty / Irene Scott vs Trisha Barney / Annie Cordova6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesSandra Brock / Rosemarie Kucharski vs Stephanie Baur / Kathleen Nisbet6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-06-02vs GTC BLUEWon 10
W#3 DoublesJudith Delein / Rosemarie Kucharski vs Ginny Crise / Tamara Whelpley6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2023-05-27vs CP YELLOWLost 02
L#1 DoublesIrene Scott / Kari Graham vs Deborah Clark / Kathryn Ballinger6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRosemarie Kucharski / Judith Delein vs Amy Crockett / Susan Pesso1-6, 1-6
2023-05-26vs SS-H GREENWon 20
W#1 DoublesRosemarie Kucharski / Carole LaBounty vs Janice Ross / Susan Panning6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKari Graham / Linda Backus vs Joanne Holden / Connie Darrow6-2, 6-4
2023-05-05vs DTC BLUEWon 20
W#2 DoublesLinda Backus / Kari Graham vs Katherine Koch / Brenda Byrne6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesRosemarie Kucharski / Barbara Hofmockel vs Cherlyn Linden / Sheri Jacobs6-4, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 6.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.75
Carole LaBounty
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.70
Rosemarie Kucharski
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.69
Kari Graham
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.69
Irene Scott
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Judith Delein
published
Linda Backus
published
Nanci Cheberenchick
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Irene Scott + Carole LaBounty6649% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Carole LaBounty
56W–41L career · 4 lines in 2023
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Rosemarie Kucharski
30W–42L career · 5 lines in 2023
8%91%2%
2.70
3
Kari Graham
95W–79L career · 4 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Irene Scott
55W–57L career · 4 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
2.69
Judith Delein
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Linda Backus
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nanci Cheberenchick
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.