Teams

Shokes/CCC/Foothills

2026 Foothills Singles 18 & over · 3.5 Singles Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-20vs Reese/DV/FoothillsSplit 11
W#2 SinglesKaren Shokes vs Colleen Sharkey6-3, 6-2
L#3 SinglesAna Paula Schweitzer vs Erin Bateman3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-08-13vs Bolick/LHCC/FoothillsLost 12
L#1 SinglesAddison Fuller vs Mindy Bolick6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesRachel Good vs Tisha Zagaroli2-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesSamantha Austin vs Jennifer Graham3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-07-29vs Bolick/LHCC/FoothillsLost 03
L#1 SinglesSondra Simmons vs Wendy Walker2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesSamantha Austin vs Mindy Bolick5-7, 1-6
L#3 SinglesAna Paula Schweitzer vs Beth Blair4-6, 1-6
2026-06-25vs Reese/DV/FoothillsWon 20
W#1 SinglesAddison Fuller vs Jill Reese2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 SinglesKaren Shokes vs Colleen Sharkey6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Singles Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Elise Wright
published 3.5
3.20
Samantha Austin
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.17
Karen Shokes
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Sondra Simmons
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Carissa Williams
published 3
3.08
Ana Paula Schweitzer
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
3.03
Rachel Good
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.98
Addison Fuller
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Shokes + Sondra Simmons1536% gamesnot enough data
Sondra Simmons + Samantha Austin134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Elise Wright
14W–6L career · no lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.29
Samantha Austin
3W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Karen Shokes
176W–86L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Sondra Simmons
157W–103L career · 1 line in 2026
10%90%1%
3.17
3
Carissa Williams
12W–9L career · no lines in 2026
<1%21%79%
3.10
3
Ana Paula Schweitzer
106W–100L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%26%74%
3.08
Rachel Good
10W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.03
3
Addison Fuller
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
2.98

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.