Teams

LA - Sassy, Flashy & Classy

2021 USTA Adult 18 & Over – LA · LA - Women 4.5

11 players · average NTRP 4.20 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-05-22vs LA - Not Our FaultWon 10
W#2 DoublesLily Reeves / Ruedeemard Odanaka vs Abbigail Fietzer / Hana Dinh6-3, 6-3
2021-05-16vs LA - Not Our FaultWon 10
W#1 SinglesMichele Mouttapa vs Celia Dominguez6-1, 6-0
2021-05-01vs LA - Not Our FaultWon 10
W#1 SinglesMichele Mouttapa vs Abbigail Fietzer6-0, 6-2
2021-04-25vs LA-LLW-Slay All Day-Jennifer DayLost 01
L#1 DoublesHolly Hubsher / Lily Reeves vs Jennifer Day / Lauren DiFazio3-6, 1-6
2021-04-17vs LA-LLW-Slay All Day-Jennifer DayLost 01
L#1 DoublesGeraldine Brantley / Ruedeemard Odanaka vs Jennifer Day / Anusha Arcalgud6-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Women 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.45
Michele Mouttapa
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.06
Ruedeemard Odanaka
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.77
Karla Boisvert
published
3.63
Lily Reeves
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.61
Iris Cox
published 4
3.57
Geraldine Brantley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.52
Fredia Waters
published 4
Sherryl Chaffin
published
Valveta Jones
published
Vanessa Paul
published
Victoria Wright
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lily Reeves + Geraldine Brantley224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Michele Mouttapa
125W–80L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%66%34%
4.45
4.5
Ruedeemard Odanaka
98W–95L career · 2 lines in 2021
31%69%<1%
4.06
Karla Boisvert
11W–6L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
Lily Reeves
41W–59L career · 2 lines in 2021
17%83%<1%
3.63
4
Iris Cox
1W–6L career · no lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
3.61
4
Geraldine Brantley
63W–104L career · 1 line in 2021
29%71%<1%
3.57
4
Fredia Waters
1W–4L career · no lines in 2021
42%58%<1%
3.52
Sherryl Chaffin
2W–8L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Valveta Jones
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Vanessa Paul
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Victoria Wright
9W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.