Teams

Appleby/Kaye/Nashville

2023 Tri-Level 18 & Over - Nashville · 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women - Monday AM

14 players · average NTRP 3.44 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-07-10vs Brooks/NashvilleLost 01
L#1 DoublesDesiree Appleby / Elizabeth Ward vs Julia Byron / Karla Brooks1-6, 1-6
2023-06-05vs Baumgartner/Stone/NashvilleLost 01
L#2 DoublesSally Kuhn / Elizabeth Ward vs Natalie Hennes / Erica Collins3-6, 3-6
2023-05-29vs Thomas/Blevins/NashvilleLost 01
L#2 DoublesDesiree Appleby / Elizabeth Ward vs Julie Burnstein / Annie Adler2-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women - Monday AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
3.52
Tonya Morris
published
3.39
Sally Kuhn
published
3.33
Brittany Drescher
published 3.5
3.28
Bettina Moore
published 3.5
3.25
Kelly Emoff
published 3.5
3.23
Liza Gaston
published
3.22
Katherine Church
published
3.06
Desiree Appleby
published 3.5
3.05
Whitney Thompson
published
2.96
Elizabeth Ward
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.95
Heidi Kaye
published
2.87
Cindy Denson
published 3
2.50
Carey Burch
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bettina Moore + Whitney Thompson6554% games+5.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christine Rudolph
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.81
Tonya Morris
5W–10L career · no lines in 2023
43%57%<1%
3.52
Sally Kuhn
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Brittany Drescher
9W–8L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
Bettina Moore
9W–9L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Kelly Emoff
61W–53L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.25
Liza Gaston
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
Katherine Church
9W–9L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Desiree Appleby
4W–17L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.06
Whitney Thompson
8W–7L career · no lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
3.05
3.5
Elizabeth Ward
110W–130L career · 3 lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
2.96
Heidi Kaye
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
64%36%<1%
2.95
3
Cindy Denson
4W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
2.87
3
Carey Burch
4W–14L career · no lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
2.50

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.