Teams

LATA 4.0W 18 & Over (Price)

2026 Tri-Level 18 & Over · Adult Women - 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Weekend

14 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-07-11vs LATA18/Jeffcoat/CAMPWon 10
W#2 DoublesMorgan Sweeney / Taylor Wray vs Victoria VanderPutten / Kayla Jackson6-4, 6-1
2026-06-27vs LATA18/Jeffcoat/CAMPWon 10
W#2 DoublesMolly Price / Becky Piper vs Lauren Pittman / Lisette Geib6-0, 4-6, 1-0
2026-06-23vs LATA18/Jeffcoat/CAMPWon 30
W#1 DoublesAmy Redfield / Amber Bryant vs Sarah Zupon / Nancy Butts Foy6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBecky Piper / Wendel Franklin vs Victoria VanderPutten / Lauren Pittman6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMorgan Sweeney / Taylor Wray vs Libby Hagins / Annagrace Jeffcoat6-2, 6-1
2026-06-06vs LATA18/Jeffcoat/CAMPWon 30
W#1 DoublesSally Nguyen / Amy Redfield vs Sarah Zupon / Jane Rangel6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMolly Price / Morgan Sweeney vs Amy Barnes / Jaimee Gauthier-Pensa6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTaylor Wray / Rayanne Moura vs Kayla Jackson / Madison Campanella7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2026-05-16vs LATA18/Jeffcoat/CAMPWon 20
W#1 DoublesAmy Redfield / Amber Bryant vs Sarah Zupon / Nancy Butts Foy6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMorgan Sweeney / Helen Cupertino vs Kelsey Piotrowski / Kayla Jackson6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Women - 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Weekend have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Sally Nguyen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.97
Amy Redfield
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.94
Kaitlin Morris
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.91
Amber Bryant
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Danielle Peeler
published 3.5
3.50
Susan Mathews
published
3.26
Becky Piper
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Wendel Franklin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Morgan Sweeney
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.11
Jessica Kritzas
published
3.10
Taylor Wray
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.01
Helen Cupertino
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Molly Price
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Rayanne Moura
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sally Nguyen + Amy Redfield12175% games+15.5% vs expected
Wendel Franklin + Becky Piper3454% games+5.5% vs expected
Taylor Wray + Morgan Sweeney5077% gamesnot enough data
Amber Bryant + Amy Redfield303 matchesnot enough data
Kaitlin Morris + Amy Redfield213 matchesnot enough data
Helen Cupertino + Morgan Sweeney303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sally Nguyen
57W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%20%80%
4.12
4
Amy Redfield
68W–19L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
3.97
Kaitlin Morris
32W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.94
4
Amber Bryant
23W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.91
3.5
Danielle Peeler
48W–19L career · no lines in 2026
<1%16%84%
3.64
Susan Mathews
39W–7L career · no lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.50
3.5
Becky Piper
36W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.26
Wendel Franklin
27W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
Morgan Sweeney
55W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%18%82%
3.13
Jessica Kritzas
7W–2L career · no lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.11
Taylor Wray
28W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%23%77%
3.10
Helen Cupertino
38W–28L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.01
Molly Price
27W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
76%24%<1%
2.90
Rayanne Moura
9W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.