Teams

WSC-Love All-Whitney

2025 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

17 players · average NTRP 3.39 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-06-01vs RBW-Symphony#5-Chan/YuWon 32
W#1 DoublesChristine Boyle / Tomoe Tawara vs Dina Kosiakova / May-Jun Chao6-0, 6-3
W#1 SinglesStacy Montagner vs Joanne Yu6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesElena Ivanova / Siobhan Whitney vs Lisa C / Yixing Xu3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesMaheen Keshani vs Tamara Runnicles3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMadalena McAllen / Judit Velcsov vs Livia Zhu / Luna Xu4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-05-18vs RBW-Symphony#5-Chan/YuWon 32
W#1 DoublesElena Ivanova / Tomoe Tawara vs Elizabeth Martin / Eloisa Tang6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesLaine Meadows vs Yixing Xu3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMadalena McAllen / Tanya Vail vs Faith Beers / Lisa C7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesLaura Borner vs Lana Johnson6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSmaranda Lieuallen / Lauren Getty vs Livia Zhu / Luna Xu6-3, 6-3
L#1 DoublesChristine Boyle / Tomoe Tawara vs Mina Park / Rebecca Garibay4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesSarah Villarreal vs Angela Xu2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesMadalena McAllen / Stacy Montagner vs Viktoria Zlatinova / Eve Le6-4, 5-2
L#2 SinglesMaheen Keshani vs Jamie Kim6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTanya Vail / Laine Meadows vs Katie Ly / Jen Hinnant3-6, 5-7
2025-05-04vs CAC/SL-McGoldrick/HansonWon 32
W#1 DoublesMadalena McAllen / Christine Boyle vs Julie McGoldrick / Colleen Hanson6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesLaura Borner vs Yasmine Hejazi3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSiobhan Whitney / Tanya Vail vs Marie Fahey / Tracy McCarron2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesAsawari Chingale vs Anahit Sukhudyan6-0, 4-3
W#3 DoublesSmaranda Lieuallen / Judit Velcsov vs Mei Yang / Ashley Hampton6-3, 7-5
2025-04-27vs FC-Aces MarWon 32
L#1 DoublesChristine Boyle / Savitha Krammer vs Justine Bang / Thuong Pham3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesStacy Montagner vs Anita Zhen7-6, 4-5
W#2 DoublesSiobhan Whitney / Tomoe Tawara vs Yen Kim / Yasmeen Mar6-1, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesAsawari Chingale vs Ellen Acuario2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesLauren Getty / Madalena McAllen vs Jennifer Kink / Junyi Wang6-3, 6-2
2025-04-13vs NTC-Team Swoop-GrahamLost 23
W#1 DoublesMadalena McAllen / Antonette Wood vs Kirsten Graham / Tiffini Connell7-5, 7-5
L#1 SinglesSarah Villarreal vs Katharine Mancini5-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesLaine Meadows / Elena Ivanova vs Pam MacDuff / Bree Olofson5-7, 3-6
W#2 SinglesAsawari Chingale vs Elisabeth LINDLEY6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTanya Vail / Smaranda Lieuallen vs Sandy Margoles / Jennifer Wagner4-6, 3-6
2025-04-12vs ETC-Fuzzy Balls-Heenan/WyerLost 14
L#1 DoublesTomoe Tawara / Laine Meadows vs Allison del Giorno / Leigh Wunderlin2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesStacy Montagner vs Alexa Licata3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMadalena McAllen / Antonette Wood vs Shan Zhu / Qiqin Zhao6-7, 1-6
L#2 SinglesMaheen Keshani vs Ana Paula Ramirez Orozco5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesSmaranda Lieuallen / Lauren Getty vs Lynn Casey / Michelle Calquhoun6-2, 6-2
2025-04-05vs PSC-BaldwinWon 41
W#1 DoublesSavitha Krammer / Tomoe Tawara vs Yi Cao / Celia Zhu6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesStacy Montagner vs Lynn Dai2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMadalena McAllen / Antonette Wood vs Dingding Lu / Lingqing Wang6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesLaura Borner vs Sanda Morea7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSiobhan Whitney / Elena Ivanova vs Monica Boris / Luisa Brown6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Madalena McAllen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.31
Christine Boyle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Stacy Montagner
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.28
Tomoe Tawara
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
Asawari Chingale
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Antonette Wood
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Lauren Getty
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.17
Savitha Krammer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Siobhan Whitney
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.16
Laine Meadows
usually #1 Doubles 25%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.06
Elena Ivanova
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.01
Smaranda Lieuallen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.92
Laura Borner
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3
2.84
Tanya Vail
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.83
Maheen Keshani
usually #2 Singles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
2.79
Judit Velcsov
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
Sarah Villarreal
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Savitha Krammer + Asawari Chingale5159% games+10.1% vs expected
Tomoe Tawara + Siobhan Whitney121053% games+4.0% vs expected
Antonette Wood + Madalena McAllen251155% games+0.2% vs expected
Christine Boyle + Tomoe Tawara4456% games−0.4% vs expected
Christine Boyle + Savitha Krammer2445% games−1.4% vs expected
Judit Velcsov + Smaranda Lieuallen8650% games−2.9% vs expected
Elena Ivanova + Siobhan Whitney121147% games−4.8% vs expected
Siobhan Whitney + Smaranda Lieuallen1636% games−5.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Madalena McAllen
138W–72L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Christine Boyle
34W–40L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
Stacy Montagner
41W–25L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Tomoe Tawara
59W–53L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Asawari Chingale
26W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Antonette Wood
152W–134L career · 8 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Lauren Getty
50W–42L career · 7 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Savitha Krammer
92W–63L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Siobhan Whitney
75W–113L career · 4 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Laine Meadows
44W–59L career · 4 lines in 2025
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Elena Ivanova
101W–92L career · 4 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.06
3.5
Smaranda Lieuallen
86W–81L career · 4 lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.01
3
Laura Borner
74W–71L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Tanya Vail
74W–110L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%88%11%
2.84
Maheen Keshani
20W–14L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
2.83
3
Judit Velcsov
88W–69L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
2.79
Sarah Villarreal
58W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.