Teams

One Love

Adult 18 & Over Winter · 3.0 Women Bucks Wed Winter

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / PHILADELPHIA

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2025-02-26vs Love HandlesLost 01
L#2 DoublesAnnina Clibanoff / Donna Marzullo vs Regina Antinori / Patti Zarkoski3-6, 1-6
2025-02-19vs Hot ShotsWon 10
W#2 DoublesDana Meltzer / Nancy Matthews vs Monica Kremer / Sherri Willenbecher6-3, 6-4
2025-02-05vs Frosty BallersSplit 11
W#2 DoublesStayci Avery / Dana Meltzer vs Lori Tinari / Christine Manion6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDonna Marzullo / Kathleen Cameron vs Lisa Young / Melissa McGrath3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-01-22vs Love HandlesLost 01
L#2 DoublesStayci Avery / Dana Meltzer vs Amy Carhart / Liz Doyle6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2025-01-15vs Frosty BallersWon 20
W#1 SinglesStayci Avery vs Lisa Ackler7-6, 4-1
W#2 DoublesDonna Marzullo / Nancy Matthews vs Sally Randall / Lisa Young6-1, 6-4
2025-01-08vs Hot ShotsLost 01
L#1 DoublesStayci Avery / Dana Meltzer vs Sarah Logue / Danielle Sibilla2-6, 6-0, 0-1
2024-12-18vs Love HandlesWon 10
W#1 DoublesStayci Avery / Dana Meltzer vs Sunny HASSETT / Liz Doyle7-6, 5-4
2024-12-11vs Frosty BallersLost 01
L#1 DoublesStayci Avery / Dana Meltzer vs Lynsey Silvesti / Kim Dunn7-5, 0-6, 0-1
2024-12-04vs Hot ShotsLost 01
L#1 DoublesDonna Marzullo / Annina Clibanoff vs Liz Ann Iacovetti / Tiffany Silbert4-6, 2-6
2024-11-20vs Love HandlesLost 01
L#2 DoublesDebra Fechter / Dana Meltzer vs Regina Antinori / Patti Zarkoski7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2024-11-13vs Frosty BallersLost 02
L#1 DoublesDonna Marzullo / Nancy Matthews vs Mary Camp / Julia Moskovitz3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesStayci Avery vs Megan Kim0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women Bucks Wed Winter have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Stayci Avery
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3
2.84
Dana Meltzer
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.84
Dana Werner
published 3
2.82
Stacie Frutkin
published
2.79
Kathleen Cameron
published
2.78
Annina Clibanoff
published 3
2.78
Danielle Lai
published 3
2.76
Joni Caimi
published
2.75
Debra Fechter
published 3
2.74
Kimberly McDermott
published
2.71
Ellyn Dratch
published
2.68
Nancy Matthews
published
2.67
Sheri Keiles
published
2.67
Donna Marzullo
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.59
Audrey Levin
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stayci Avery + Debra Fechter7557% games+10.5% vs expected
Dana Meltzer + Sheri Keiles4358% games+9.5% vs expected
Joni Caimi + Debra Fechter4165% games+5.6% vs expected
Audrey Levin + Joni Caimi8555% games+3.3% vs expected
Audrey Levin + Sheri Keiles5253% games+2.6% vs expected
Debra Fechter + Dana Meltzer7453% games+2.5% vs expected
Stayci Avery + Dana Meltzer383652% games+0.9% vs expected
Audrey Levin + Debra Fechter14854% games+0.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Stayci Avery
81W–61L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%86%14%
2.85
3
Dana Meltzer
77W–75L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Dana Werner
22W–25L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.84
Stacie Frutkin
22W–21L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Kathleen Cameron
37W–38L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Annina Clibanoff
33W–37L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Danielle Lai
10W–11L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
Joni Caimi
84W–81L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%4%
2.76
3
Debra Fechter
68W–41L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
Kimberly McDermott
41W–70L career · no lines in 2025
4%92%3%
2.74
Ellyn Dratch
44W–64L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
Nancy Matthews
47W–53L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Sheri Keiles
39W–37L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Donna Marzullo
60W–107L career · type A · 5 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.67
3
Audrey Levin
59W–45L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
2.59

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.