Teams

Laurel Oak Rosenberg

2024 Sarasota Combo 50 & Over Fall Weekday · 7.5 M Wednesday Eve

9 players · average NTRP 3.90 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-12-11vs Sarasota/Risquez/50&Over7.5MWon 10
W#1 DoublesDavid Rosenberg / Joe Malave vs Steven Totterdale / Ron Forzani6-2, 7-5
2024-12-09vs Payne Park ConantWon 10
W#3 DoublesDave Barcomb / Joe Malave vs John Grinols / Ron Hilyer Jr6-7, 6-0, 1-0
2024-11-13vs Sarasota/Risquez/50&Over7.5MWon 10
W#2 DoublesJoe Malave / Mike Beasley vs Jim Fiumefreddo / Nader Massoumi6-4, 6-2
2024-10-30vs Sarasota/Risquez/50&Over7.5MWon 10
W#3 DoublesDavid Rosenberg / Joe Malave vs Gustavo Risquez / Steven Totterdale3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-10-23vs Payne Park ConantLost 01
L#2 DoublesDave Barcomb / Joe Malave vs John Grinols / Ron Hilyer Jr4-6, 2-6
2024-10-02vs Payne Park ConantLost 01
L#1 DoublesDavid Rosenberg / Joe Malave vs Jiri Moravec / Nelson Cabrera7-6, 0-6, 0-1
2024-09-18vs Sarasota/Risquez/50&Over7.5MLost 01
L#1 DoublesMike Beasley / Joe Malave vs Jim Fiumefreddo / Nader Massoumi2-6, 1-6
2024-09-11Won 10
W#2 DoublesAJ Albright / Joe Malave vs Andrew Phillips / Paul Johnson7-5, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 M Wednesday Eve have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Dave Barcomb
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.69
AJ Albright
published 4
3.63
Joe Malave
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.41
David Rosenberg
published 4
3.38
Bradley Sutter
published 3.5
3.22
Jonah Brum
published
Jim Lindell
published
Kenneth Schwartz
published
Mike Beasley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dave Barcomb + Joe Malave6352% gamesnot enough data
Kenneth Schwartz + Bradley Sutter4250% gamesnot enough data
Jim Lindell + Jonah Brum3253% gamesnot enough data
Dave Barcomb + David Rosenberg123 matchesnot enough data
Kenneth Schwartz + Jonah Brum123 matchesnot enough data
Bradley Sutter + AJ Albright213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dave Barcomb
54W–67L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
AJ Albright
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Joe Malave
127W–103L career · 8 lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.63
4
David Rosenberg
11W–17L career · no lines in 2024
75%25%<1%
3.41
3.5
Bradley Sutter
11W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.38
Jonah Brum
10W–10L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%1%
3.22
Jim Lindell
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kenneth Schwartz
7W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mike Beasley
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.