Teams

SGV ZZZ-Zang-Scholl/SA10

2025 Winter Team Singles · SGV - Men 3.0

5 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-04-05vs SGV Super Servers-Schiffman- WN/SALost 01
L#1 SinglesAndy Zang vs Shunkou Kinoshita2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesZhenqi Zhang vs Ian Kaufman0-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesAndy Zang vs Mark Read3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 SinglesKirby Xu vs Ted Chi6-3, 7-5
2025-03-22vs SGV Dare Doubles-Tien-WN/SUWon 21
W#1 SinglesKirby Xu vs Jason Tien7-5, 6-2
W#2 SinglesZhenqi Zhang vs Afonso Miu6-4, 6-2
L#3 SinglesChanglin Wu vs Gongqin Shen1-6, 4-6
2025-03-22vs SGV Super Servers-Schiffman- WN/SALost 01
L#2 SinglesAndy Zang vs Christopher Taus6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2025-03-02vs SGV Dare Doubles-Tien-WN/SULost 12
L#1 SinglesKirby Xu vs Anthony Canapi6-7, 0-6
L#2 SinglesSiyang Pei vs Afonso Miu4-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesZhenqi Zhang vs Eric Chang7-5, 6-1
L#1 SinglesKirby Xu vs Fred Kao2-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesChanglin Wu vs Ted Chi4-6, 2-6
2025-02-16vs SGV Dare Doubles-Tien-WN/SUSplit 11
L#2 SinglesZhenqi Zhang vs Anthony Canapi1-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesKirby Xu vs Daniel Wu6-0, 6-0
L#1 SinglesKirby Xu vs Christopher Taus3-6, 6-7
W#2 SinglesAndy Zang vs Michael Chu6-2, 6-3
W#3 SinglesChanglin Wu vs Riley Klarkowski3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 SinglesZhenqi Zhang vs Sammy Tse3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 SinglesSiyang Pei vs Ted Chi1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Men 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Kirby Xu
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
3.12
Andy Zang
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
2.70
Changlin Wu
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
Siyang Pei
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
Zhenqi Zhang
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andy Zang + Changlin Wu11460% games+11.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kirby Xu
14W–16L career · 6 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Andy Zang
33W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.12
3
Changlin Wu
17W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
2.70
Siyang Pei
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Zhenqi Zhang
2W–3L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.