Teams

Transfer/Refund

2022 Tri-Level Men · Holding

8 players · average NTRP 4.33 / NEW JERSEY REGION

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Holding have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.84 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.37
Kishan Dalal
published
Allan Orchard
published 4.5
Didrick Manahan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.06
Aarav Modi
published 4
3.09
Ronald Luyo
published
Alfred Kandakai
published
Mitesh Patel
published
Ryan Dawson
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kishan Dalal
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
4.37
4.5
Allan Orchard
81W–33L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Didrick Manahan
27W–16L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
4
Aarav Modi
6W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2022
<1%31%69%
4.06
Ronald Luyo
27W–34L career · no lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.09
Alfred Kandakai
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mitesh Patel
31W–28L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Ryan Dawson
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.