Teams

Hermitage - Sadusky 4.0 Weekend

2025 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend 4.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.80 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-06-08vs Belmont - HouffLost 01
L#1 DoublesRyan Bardaro / Bert Teachey vs Brian Zollinhofer / Hamid Mahmood1-6, 1-6
2025-05-31vs MAC Kane 4.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesBert Teachey / Ryan Bardaro vs Alex Abbott / Nicholas Smith6-3, 6-4
2025-05-18vs CCV AveryLost 02
L#2 DoublesRyan Bardaro / Daniel Essad vs Edward Rider / Russell Moore6-7, 3-6
L#2 SinglesBert Teachey vs Rich McDaniel2-6, 3-6
2025-05-04vs ACAC NedeffWon 10
W#2 DoublesDavid Robinson / Bert Teachey vs Almedin Muminovic / Marc Oosterhuis6-2, 7-5
2025-04-27vs Westwood Ladybugs - CecilLost 01
L#2 DoublesDavid Robinson / Ryan Bardaro vs Brian Rabhan / Kory Painter5-7, 2-6
2025-04-13vs Westwood Heavy Hitters - LeftwichWon 10
W#3 DoublesRyan Bardaro / Bert Teachey vs Christopher Caputo / Harry Turton6-2, 6-3
2025-04-06vs 4.0 TDC Orioles-ShermanLost 01
L#2 DoublesBryan Fisher / Ryan Bardaro vs Scott Sorkin / Kevin McGee2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Mac Stuckey
published
3.77
Ram Raghavan
published
3.72
Ryan Politowicz
published
3.72
Bert Teachey
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.67
Bryan Fisher
published 4
3.64
Kelby Morgan
published
3.62
Daniel Sadusky
published 4
3.35
Jon Nystrom
published
3.35
Ryan Bardaro
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published 3.5
Daniel Essad
published 3.5
Philip Rackliffe
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mac Stuckey + Bryan Fisher8160% games+3.6% vs expected
Ryan Bardaro + Bert Teachey212547% games+2.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mac Stuckey
14W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.87
Ram Raghavan
9W–10L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
Ryan Politowicz
16W–13L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Bert Teachey
119W–144L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%94%2%
3.72
4
Bryan Fisher
12W–3L career · no lines in 2025
10%90%1%
3.67
Kelby Morgan
10W–15L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
3.64
4
Daniel Sadusky
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.62
Jon Nystrom
9W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Ryan Bardaro
177W–150L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Daniel Essad
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Philip Rackliffe
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.