Teams

AYTC-Nocom

2025 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-05-24vs WSC-MIB-HanWon 50
W#1 DoublesBrian Quach / Lawrence Paltep vs Yuanwei Zhang / Alvin Han3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#1 SinglesVictor Hoang vs Zeshi Du6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJonas Albert Nocom / Bao Vu vs Kelvin Yao / Yunlan Li6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesPhi Hoang vs Zirun Zhu6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTruong Ho / Jimmy Bui vs Nelson Yang / Shuai Lu7-6, 5-0
2025-05-17vs NWW-ETC-ShenLost 12
L#1 DoublesLawrence Paltep / Jonas Albert Nocom vs Stephen Wang / Sandrio Elim3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJason Nguyen / Truong Ho vs Adonis Acuario / Joseph Lam6-3, 6-2
L#2 SinglesPrateek Sharma vs Michael Liu0-6, 1-6
2025-05-11vs CP-EagleFang-MeylesLost 04
L#1 DoublesBrian Quach / Lawrence Paltep vs Anton Kirilov / Atanas Koralski6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesPhi Hoang vs Jayden Chen3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJason Nguyen / Truong Ho vs Darren Gray / Dan Feng1-6, 2-1
L#3 DoublesRichard Zhou / Prateek Sharma vs Savas Parastatidis / Robert Bengford1-6, 0-6
2025-05-10vs HBSQ-Frog and Volley-RichLost 14
L#1 DoublesBrian Quach / Jonas Albert Nocom vs Mike Miller / Jeff Mcdowell6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesPhi Hoang vs Jeremy Maschman3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesPrateek Sharma / Georgy Manucharyan vs Thomas O'Rourke / Joseph Carter5-7, 3-6
L#2 SinglesLawrence Paltep vs Yosuke Miyashita1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesBao Vu / Truong Ho vs John Haines / Sanjay Chopra6-1, 6-3
2025-05-03vs EDG-Warriors-MoosmanLost 14
L#1 DoublesJason Nguyen / Jimmy Bui vs Matt Kempf / Yuan Wang2-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesVictor Hoang vs Andy Zollers6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJonas Albert Nocom / Prateek Sharma vs Matias Fernandez / Vijay Dasari1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesPhi Hoang vs Aaron Horton3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesGeorgy Manucharyan / Richard Zhou vs Ming Fan / Darren Carrido3-6, 6-7
2025-04-27vs TCSP-Volley Llamas-TrattWon 50
W#1 DoublesJason Nguyen / Jimmy Bui vs Mark Lewin / Omar Johnson6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesVictor Hoang vs Anish N6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBrian Quach / Jj Nocom vs Howard Choder / Norman Yee6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesPhi Hoang vs Howard Willson6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJonas Albert Nocom / Bao Vu vs Adam Tratt / Ted Kalmus6-4, 6-1
2025-04-13vs BC-Hitmen-SmithSplit 22
W#1 DoublesVictor Hoang / Beagan Nguy vs Bruce Seeley / David Sandwith7-6, 7-5
L#1 SinglesPrateek Sharma vs Michael Wang1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesBrian Quach / Bao Vu vs Matthew Klutznick / Jared Oren4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesPhi Hoang / Truong Ho vs Brad Smith / John Manning6-2, 6-3
2025-03-29vs ETC-Chinn 3.0MLost 12
L#1 DoublesJason Nguyen / Jimmy Bui vs Daniel Du / Joon Yang4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesBrian Quach / Jonas Albert Nocom vs Ben Stickley / Jonathan Dong6-3, 6-3
L#2 SinglesPrateek Sharma vs Sam Ulloa0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Beagan Nguy
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.22
Victor Hoang
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.95
Jason Nguyen
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
2.82
Jonas Albert Nocom
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.78
Phi Hoang
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.77
Brian Quach
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.75
Jimmy Bui
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.67
Truong Ho
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.65
Bao Vu
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.59
Lawrence Paltep
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.54
Prateek Sharma
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Jj Nocom
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Richard Zhou
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beagan Nguy + Victor Hoang4649% games+4.6% vs expected
Truong Ho + Jimmy Bui224 matchesnot enough data
Bao Vu + Jonas Albert Nocom314 matchesnot enough data
Jimmy Bui + Jason Nguyen123 matchesnot enough data
Jonas Albert Nocom + Brian Quach213 matchesnot enough data
Brian Quach + Lawrence Paltep123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Beagan Nguy
32W–59L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
Victor Hoang
24W–22L career · 9 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Jason Nguyen
6W–8L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.95
Jonas Albert Nocom
7W–11L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Phi Hoang
16W–23L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Brian Quach
5W–5L career · 6 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
Jimmy Bui
5W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.75
Truong Ho
12W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Bao Vu
7W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
2.65
Lawrence Paltep
2W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
25%74%<1%
2.59
2.5
Prateek Sharma
11W–11L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%40%60%
2.54
Jj Nocom
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Richard Zhou
1W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.