Teams

LADERA OAKS 18AW3.5A

2025 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 3.5

22 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 22 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Teresa Moye
published
3.58
Katja Gagen
published
3.57
Katie Schmidt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Patricia Buck
published
3.32
Kate Pollock
published
3.31
Carole Donnelly
published 3.5
3.28
Melissa Weiss
published
3.27
Sarah Chai
published
3.27
Amber Johnsen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Dana Weintraub
published 3.5
3.24
Kaori Neubauer
published
3.23
Missy Robinson
published
3.21
Khin Tint
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Caren Taylor
published 3.5
3.13
Lisa Sweeney
published
3.13
Eunju Sagurton
published
3.13
Shannon Wolfe
published
3.06
Julie Mandia
published
2.92
Kristin Jacobson
published
2.91
Komal Goel
published
2.87
Jennifer Walker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carole Donnelly + Sarah Chai213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Teresa Moye
20W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.64
Katja Gagen
36W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.58
Katie Schmidt
16W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.57
Marta Niemczyk-Niewiadomska
16W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.48
Patricia Buck
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
Kate Pollock
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Carole Donnelly
9W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Melissa Weiss
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Sarah Chai
14W–14L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Amber Johnsen
21W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Dana Weintraub
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.25
Kaori Neubauer
11W–10L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Missy Robinson
11W–17L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Khin Tint
40W–42L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Caren Taylor
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.15
Lisa Sweeney
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13
Eunju Sagurton
11W–14L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.13
Shannon Wolfe
7W–12L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.13
Julie Mandia
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.06
Kristin Jacobson
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
71%29%<1%
2.92
Komal Goel
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
74%26%<1%
2.91
Jennifer Walker
52W–30L career · no lines in 2025
83%17%<1%
2.87

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.