Teams

CC SLOCC Strong 3.5W

2025 USTA CC Spring Adult 18 & OVER · CC USTA 3.5W 18 & OVER

13 players · average NTRP 3.31 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-06-14vs CC TTR Pastel Crew 3.5WWon 20
W#1 DoublesEllyn Billingsley / Danielle Corry vs Libby Kerr / Lori Martin4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJenna Hicks / Genevieve Arjal vs Darla Batistic / Jennie Williams6-7, 6-0, 1-0
2025-05-31vs CC - LLW - Avila Fireballs 3.5WLost 02
L#1 DoublesCamila Strong / Sarah Krueckel vs Shannon Dossa / Jiao Hua Zhou1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJenna Hicks / Jami Wozniak vs Colleen Moss / Kelley Munson3-6, 6-0, 0-1
2025-05-04vs CC TTR Pastel Crew 3.5WSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKristen Bertram-Spiegel / Sarah Krueckel vs Carolyn Lochhead / Joan Jordan6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesJami Wozniak / Melissa Allen vs Libby Kerr / Francie Kelley6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2025-05-02vs CC - LLW - Avila Fireballs 3.5WLost 02
L#1 DoublesNikki Billingsley / Kristen Bertram-Spiegel vs Shannon Dossa / Jessica Blackburn3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesSabrina Ball / Danielle Corry vs Kelley Munson / Colleen Moss3-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CC USTA 3.5W 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Abrianna Rose
usually #1 Singles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.63
Danielle Corry
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.50
Camila Strong
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.45
Sabrina Ball
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.41
Nikki Billingsley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Jami Wozniak
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Ellyn Billingsley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Genevieve Arjal
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.87
Cindy Gresser
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Carlee Starkey
published 3
Jenna Hicks
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kristen Bertram-Spiegel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sarah Krueckel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nikki Billingsley + Abrianna Rose10271% games+11.1% vs expected
Ellyn Billingsley + Abrianna Rose314 matchesnot enough data
Sarah Krueckel + Camila Strong213 matchesnot enough data
Jami Wozniak + Abrianna Rose303 matchesnot enough data
Abrianna Rose + Danielle Corry303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Abrianna Rose
45W–12L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%5%95%
3.72
3.5
Danielle Corry
16W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%17%83%
3.63
3.5
Camila Strong
43W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.50
Sabrina Ball
7W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.45
Nikki Billingsley
14W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Jami Wozniak
7W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Ellyn Billingsley
14W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
1%93%6%
3.29
3
Genevieve Arjal
9W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%14%86%
3.14
3
Cindy Gresser
8W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%84%15%
2.87
3
Carlee Starkey
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jenna Hicks
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kristen Bertram-Spiegel
5W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sarah Krueckel
7W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.