Teams

MJones (Life Time)

2023 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over 6.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-10-06vs VSofarelli/VKoskinas (WSRC)Split 11
W#1 DoublesRaquel Correa / Megan Pruski vs Victoria Sofarelli / Donnarae Phillips6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesErin Clapham / Elizabeth Campbell vs Lindsey Barnes / Jamie Zarambo3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-09-25vs MHabegger (Colonel Beatty)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesScarlet Grindle / Laura Fox vs Laurie Rosser / Silvia Engel7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2023-09-18vs LGildea (MPCC)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesTiffany Kopittke / Sonia Waters vs Kellie Lecka / Allison Chatman6-0, 5-7, 0-1
2023-09-11vs SStorck (Jeff Adams)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesEmily Pease / Toni Escuder vs Sarah Smulktis / Jessica Walker3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2023-09-04vs VSofarelli/VKoskinas (WSRC)Won 21
L#1 DoublesMegan Pruski / Kristy Simmons vs Victoria Sofarelli / Donnarae Phillips7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesErin Clapham / Elizabeth Campbell vs Vickie Koskinas / Sherry Teat6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesEmily Pease / Toni Escuder vs Allison Haden / Kimberly Borans6-2, 6-0
2023-08-28vs JWaleski (OPRC)Split 11
W#1 DoublesMegan Pruski / Raquel Correa vs Jennifer Danesis / Alison Milas6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesTiffany Kopittke / Sonia Waters vs Christine Shultz / Stacey Young6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2023-08-21vs KCrosby/KJohnson (Sardis)Split 11
W#1 DoublesErin Clapham / Toni Escuder vs Holly Foley / Deborah Spaugh6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesScarlet Grindle / Raquel Correa vs Mary Laird Garrison / Elizabeth Tabor4-6, 2-6
2023-08-07vs MHabegger (Colonel Beatty)Won 10
W#1 DoublesMegan Pruski / Raquel Correa vs Laurie Rosser / Dany Marie7-5, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Megan Pruski
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.69
Emily Pease
published 4
3.44
Sonia Waters
published
3.41
Dana Holloman
published 3.5
3.34
Erin Clapham
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.34
Toni Escuder
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Kristy Simmons
published
3.16
Misty Jones
published
3.13
Tiffany Kopittke
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.03
Raquel Correa
published
2.83
Laura Difraia
published
2.82
Scarlet Grindle
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.75
Jennifer McCoy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tiffany Kopittke + Emily Pease6549% games−0.5% vs expected
Erin Clapham + Sonia Waters4445% games−7.6% vs expected
Toni Escuder + Erin Clapham4166% gamesnot enough data
Scarlet Grindle + Misty Jones314 matchesnot enough data
Kristy Simmons + Sonia Waters224 matchesnot enough data
Tiffany Kopittke + Erin Clapham404 matchesnot enough data
Misty Jones + Emily Pease314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Megan Pruski
71W–57L career · 8 lines in 2023
5%94%2%
3.72
4
Emily Pease
27W–16L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.69
Sonia Waters
31W–24L career · no lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
3.44
3.5
Dana Holloman
22W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Erin Clapham
93W–84L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Toni Escuder
66W–63L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%89%10%
3.34
Kristy Simmons
22W–14L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
Misty Jones
27W–30L career · no lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Tiffany Kopittke
79W–64L career · 2 lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.13
Raquel Correa
5W–5L career · no lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
3.03
Laura Difraia
7W–11L career · no lines in 2023
90%10%<1%
2.83
Scarlet Grindle
103W–60L career · 4 lines in 2023
92%8%<1%
2.82
Jennifer McCoy
26W–23L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
2.75

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.