Teams

Guerriero/55/W/3.5/FORS

2026 Monroe Adult 55 & Over - Women · 3.5 Monroe (55&O) Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-03-28vs Patterson/55/W/3.5/MACLost 02
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Guerriero / Diana Breen vs Rachel Patterson / Virginia Eddleman4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSue Blackford / Belinda Crymes vs Dianne Graham / Jane Jarrett3-6, 4-6
2026-03-15vs Patterson/55/W/3.5/MACWon 21
L#1 DoublesDiana Breen / Belinda Crymes vs Jane Jarrett / Debbie Barthel2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Guerriero / Milly McIntyre vs Rachel Patterson / Brenda Wilson6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSharon Dollins / Lisa Edwards vs Janis Battaglia / Deborah Burgess3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-03-07vs Patterson/55/W/3.5/MACLost 03
L#1 DoublesLee Ainsworth / Milly McIntyre vs Virginia Eddleman / Dianne Graham4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSharon Dollins / Lisa Edwards vs Debbie Barthel / Jane Jarrett6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCheryl Metzger / Diana Breen vs Janis Battaglia / Deborah Burgess7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2026-02-28vs Patterson/55/W/3.5/MACLost 12
W#1 DoublesJulie Johnson / Lee Ainsworth vs Janis Battaglia / Deborah Burgess2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBelinda Crymes / Sue Blackford vs Rachel Patterson / Nina Tomlinson4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesSharon Dollins / Cheryl Metzger vs Dianne Graham / Jane Jarrett2-6, 5-7
2026-02-22vs Patterson/55/W/3.5/MACLost 12
L#1 DoublesLisa Edwards / Sue Blackford vs Jane Jarrett / Debbie Barthel1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDiana Breen / Elizabeth Guerriero vs Janis Battaglia / Deborah Burgess1-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesJulie Johnson / Lee Ainsworth vs Ann Mc Intyre / Nina Tomlinson3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Monroe (55&O) Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Lee Ainsworth
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.24
Cheryl Metzger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Milly McIntyre
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.20
Sharon Dollins
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.17
Elizabeth Guerriero
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.16
Diana Breen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.08
Belinda Crymes
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.00
Sue Blackford
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lee Ainsworth
4W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Cheryl Metzger
1W–4L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
Milly McIntyre
4W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%2%
3.22
Sharon Dollins
6W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
Elizabeth Guerriero
4W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Diana Breen
9W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
13%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Belinda Crymes
1W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.08
Sue Blackford
1W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
3.00

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.