Teams

SDNC 9.0 RPTC/ Shintani

2022 Adult 55 & Over Summer- SDNC · SDNC

7 players · average NTRP 4.33 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#3 DoublesSandra Coimbra / Margaret Hulme vs Karyn McCartney / Stacey Dusseault6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2022-08-15vs SD 9.0 Peninsula TC/ SpragueLost 01
L#2 DoublesSandra Coimbra / Margaret Hulme vs Fiona Taylor / Robyn K F Leong2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLori Hurst / Sarah Miller vs Kelley McNaught-Davis Hess / Nadia Shokrai6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSandra Coimbra / Miki Shintani vs Lynn Ryan / Susan Bourcy6-4, 6-2
2022-07-25vs SD 9.0 Peninsula TC/ SpragueLost 01
L#3 DoublesSandra Coimbra / Margaret Hulme vs Sundi Olson / Laura Steenstra2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesTricia Johnson / Miki Shintani vs Dolores Ilko / Anna Palmer2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSarah Miller / Margaret Hulme vs Adele Psyllos / Pam Hartman3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSophia Richardson / Miki Shintani vs Richette Lock / Jennifer Anderson4-6, 2-6
2022-06-27vs SD 9.0 Peninsula TC/ SpragueLost 02
L#1 DoublesVicky Wolfe / Margaret Hulme vs Carolyn Barber / Patricia Matsuoka6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMiki Shintani / Sandra Coimbra vs Pamela Seggerman / Ruth Young3-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesKathleen Gallo / Lori Hurst vs Dolores Ilko / Anna Palmer1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMargaret Hulme / Michele Moraros Aguilar vs Lisa Crisafulli / Caron Schraeder1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.03 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Lori Hurst
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.12
Sophia Richardson
published
4.08
Kathleen Gallo
published
4.01
Miki Shintani
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.96
Margaret Hulme
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.90
Megan Steadman
published
Vicky Wolfe
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Margaret Hulme + Lori Hurst1440% gamesnot enough data
Miki Shintani + Lori Hurst2342% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Lori Hurst
29W–48L career · 2 lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
4.13
Sophia Richardson
27W–31L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
4.12
Kathleen Gallo
10W–5L career · no lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
4.08
4.5
Miki Shintani
58W–76L career · 4 lines in 2022
46%54%<1%
4.01
4
Margaret Hulme
65W–49L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%63%37%
3.96
Megan Steadman
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
78%22%<1%
3.90
Vicky Wolfe
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.