Teams

ATFC-Dix

2025 ADULT 40 & Over · 4.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 4.33 / SOUTHERN OREGON

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-05-04vs S OR-ESTC-FowlerSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAdam McDougle / Zachary Matthews vs Ayren Spinner / Mike Lees2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJohn Dix vs Michael Stearns4-6, 4-6
2025-05-03vs S OR-ESTC-FowlerLost 02
L#1 DoublesAdam McDougle / Adam Stamper vs Ayren Spinner / Richard Shugar3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesJohn Dix vs Michael Stearns6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2025-05-03vs S OR-ESTC-FowlerLost 02
L#1 DoublesJohn Dix / Adam Stamper vs Preston Martin / Dan Fischer0-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAdam McDougle vs Richard Shugar3-6, 4-6
2025-05-02vs S OR-ESTC-FowlerWon 10
W#1 DoublesJohn Dix / Adam McDougle vs Ayren Spinner / Mike Lees6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1S OR-ESTC-Fowler401338114
2ATFC-Dix0431327175

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.20 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Adam McDougle
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4.5
Adam Stamper
published 4.5
Christopher Daley
published 4.5
4.21
Zachary Matthews
published
4.18
John Dix
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4.5
Douglass Neuman
published 4
Hal Borg
published 4
Jason Roberts
published
Ronald Beers
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Dix + Adam Stamper9551% games+2.2% vs expected
Adam McDougle + Adam Stamper224 matchesnot enough data
Christopher Daley + Jason Roberts033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Adam McDougle
4W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Adam Stamper
13W–11L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Christopher Daley
9W–14L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Zachary Matthews
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
5%93%1%
4.21
4.5
John Dix
32W–30L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
4.18
4
Douglass Neuman
1W–0L career · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Hal Borg
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jason Roberts
8W–10L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Ronald Beers
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.