Teams

Shy/Pace 40s 7.5 Combo W Wed PM

2024 Piedmont Combo 40 & Over · 7.5 40 & Over Women

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-10-07Won 10
W#2 DoublesSherrie Kruse / Gina Goy vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#1 DoublesSherrie Kruse / Patty Dutton vs Bonnie Satterfield / Courtney Jones5-7, 4-6
L#1 DoublesSherrie Kruse / Patty Dutton vs Marlene Crewes / Angela Muller2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesGladys Dunn / Evelyn Strader vs Lisa Andree / Pamela Hughes3-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesEvelyn Strader / Gina Goy vs Joy Martin / Kimberly Salata4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSherrie Kruse / Jill Elam vs Bonnie Satterfield / Kimberly Gay0-6, 3-6
2024-08-14vs Brown 40s 7.5 Combo W Wed PMSplit 11
W#2 DoublesSherrie Kruse / Jan Whittaker vs Ann Evans / Marsha Tice3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesEvelyn Strader / Lisa Shy vs Nan Elizabeth Joyce / Vangie Cruz3-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 40 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Ibby Greene
published
3.71
Pam McAmis
published
3.54
Mary Batts
published
3.50
Gina Goy
published
3.45
Evelyn Strader
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.32
Gladys Dunn
published
3.24
Patty Dutton
published
3.18
Jan Whittaker
published
2.97
Jill Elam
published
Lisa Shy
published
Sherrie Kruse
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chetana Honnarayanahalli + Gina Goy41142% games+3.9% vs expected
Evelyn Strader + Sherrie Kruse2746% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ibby Greene
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.90
Pam McAmis
13W–22L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.71
Mary Batts
30W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%40%60%
3.54
Gina Goy
33W–35L career · no lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
3.50
Evelyn Strader
66W–110L career · 3 lines in 2024
63%37%<1%
3.45
4
Chetana Honnarayanahalli
30W–30L career · type A · no lines in 2024
71%29%<1%
3.42
Gladys Dunn
28W–21L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
Patty Dutton
20W–24L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
Jan Whittaker
10W–13L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Jill Elam
19W–30L career · no lines in 2024
58%42%<1%
2.97
Lisa Shy
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sherrie Kruse
32W–60L career · 10 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.