Teams

WSolomon (Carmel)

2025 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over 7.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.73 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-10-02vs APatrocino (Life Time)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesSuzannah Hicks / Beth Hahn vs Amanda Patrocino / Colleen Beierwaltes2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesClaire Daniels / Robin Mermans vs Anura Patel / Michele Sutherland4-6, 3-6
2025-09-25vs SChudgar/AValentin (Park Road)Won 30
W#1 DoublesAmanda Jarman / Sandy Dellinger vs Sophie Trantham / Sylvia Holper7-5, 7-6
W#2 DoublesAmy Elaasar / Jill Halverstam vs Krystal Carmichael / Miriam Manga6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesWendy Solomon / Katie Sarjeant vs Sherry Teat / Carol Davis7-6, 6-2
2025-09-18vs ERoach/SJPragasam (Jeff Adams)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesKatie Sarjeant / Paige Whitney vs Gabriela Cooper-Vespa / SJ Pragasam1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-09-11vs KWalters/HLee (Piper Glen)Split 11
W#1 DoublesSuzannah Hicks / Claire Daniels vs Amy Langdon / Jennifer Martin7-6, 7-5
L#3 DoublesAmy Elaasar / Katie Sarjeant vs Shelley Crocker / Lauren Pruett Strickler4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-09-04vs STo (OPRC)Won 20
W#1 DoublesAmanda Jarman / Claire Daniels vs Shelley Brunker / Debbie O'Connor5-7, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRobin Mermans / Dana Fox vs Jenni Beasley / Angie Wu6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-08-28vs KHeidkamp (PCC)Won 10
W#3 DoublesJill Halverstam / Amy Elaasar vs Elizabeth Suppa / Susie Fragale6-1, 6-2
2025-08-21vs NHaskins (Queens)Won 10
W#3 DoublesSuzannah Hicks / Beth Hahn vs Alexus Govert / Melissa Weaver6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Suzannah Hicks
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.84
Dana Fox
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.81
Amanda Jarman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.80
Paige Whitney
published
3.70
Amy Erwin
published 4
3.66
Robin Mermans
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.62
Amy Elaasar
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.49
Claire Daniels
published 3.5
3.48
Callie Tucker
published 3.5
3.48
Wendy Solomon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Beth Hahn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Jill Halverstam
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Sandy Dellinger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Katie Sarjeant
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beth Hahn + Sandy Dellinger2340% gamesnot enough data
Suzannah Hicks + Amanda Jarman314 matchesnot enough data
Wendy Solomon + Amanda Jarman213 matchesnot enough data
Jill Halverstam + Suzannah Hicks213 matchesnot enough data
Jill Halverstam + Robin Mermans213 matchesnot enough data
Jill Halverstam + Sandy Dellinger213 matchesnot enough data
Amy Erwin + Amanda Jarman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Suzannah Hicks
100W–73L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
Dana Fox
15W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%88%11%
3.84
4
Amanda Jarman
36W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.81
Paige Whitney
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Amy Erwin
5W–12L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
3.5
Robin Mermans
35W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%12%88%
3.66
4
Amy Elaasar
16W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.62
3.5
Claire Daniels
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
3.49
3.5
Callie Tucker
10W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
Wendy Solomon
13W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
3.48
3.5
Beth Hahn
21W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Jill Halverstam
91W–46L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
3.34
Sandy Dellinger
15W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Katie Sarjeant
92W–59L career · 3 lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.15

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.